dc20015
Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2012
- Messages
- 188
- Reaction score
- 17
The lead article on this thread noted that the torso was dead probably 3 days when the body was found, so a good photo of the tattoo would be reasonable. I also think the letters on the tat look like T and B and ??. Would love to have the tattoo artist's opinion on the letters. Also, Id guess the letters could be initials for her boyfriend, her toddler, or other family member (less likely to be hers)?
I was very surprised at the article linking Peaches to Baby Doe and to Jane Doe 3. If she's Peaches, then this means they both went missing in June 1997, so missing persons cases from later years are now discounted as possible matches, right? So a more narrow set of missing persons, but the extra years that have ticked past will make ID that much tougher. It certainly made me wonder when the authorities made the DNA link - I certainly can't believe this is new news to them. The lack of transparency makes it even tougher for the public to assist with any tips to ID this woman and child.
MOO
Depends how you define missing. If she had run away for example it could've been months or years earlier than June 1997
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk