southernpixie said:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,198870,00.html
"Will there be a Mission: Impossible 4? Considering that No. 3 has been a bust
in America, the chances are slim to none at this point.
Thank goodness, though, that South Korea still loves
Tom Cruise. And France and Great Britain for that matter. If they didnt, Mission: Impossible 3 would have been a total bust. In America, M: I3 has been kind of a box office nightmare."
WOW! From the link you posted:
If M: I3 ekes out another $10 million at the box office here, and finishes around $135 million, that will not be good news. The acknowledged production budget was $150 million. As one Paramount insider sniffed to me the other day, If thats what theyre admitting to, then its at least $175 million.
From there you can add on a good $75 million for promotion and advertising. Make that a minimum $250 million total price tag, although a slightly higher number is not out of the question.
Now, here come the big expenses: Between Cruises upfront paycheck and his points on gross, you can subtract $25 million right away. Take away another $75 million to theater owners. Now youre starting to get the picture. The mission is impossible.
One thing that Mission: Impossible 3 did do is extend Cruises unusual record of $100 million movies that were flops. Curiously, all of his panned, unliked and dismissed movies of recent years like The Last Samurai, Vanilla Sky, Collateral and Minority Report made it past the finish line. His only actual blockbuster hit since M: I2 has been War of the Worlds, but that had more to do with Steven Spielberg and massive special effects than Cruises appeal.
_______________________________
I thought the movie was doing better than that, but I'm glad it isn't.