I didn't get anything (new) out of reading the transcript, the conversation takes so many U turns it was hard not to get dizzy. But it does seem she kept trying to keep the conversation on either sex or travel, or naming people (they mentioned a couple and she had to identify the girl by first and last name, totally unnecessary in the context), most of it seems to be for blackmail/smearing.
Yeah, she dyed her hair around the end of March, near the time Zach's camera was found in T's BMW.
I don't know anything about recording to a cell, could she keep the May 10th date on it and still splice and save?
On day 13 of the 1st trial, Bryan Neumeister testified the Helio had 7 recordings on it and he used 5 of the 7 recordings to create the sex tape DVD. 2 recordings had nothing to do with this case and were not included in the DVD.
The sex tape can also be divided into 5 parts and they don't flow naturally into the next part:
-Travel talk, Abe...
-Sex talk (milder sex of the two. about 3 minutes long)
-Travel talk, Danny Jones...
-Sex (about 25 minutes)
-KY, Ehrenberg, movies, singing...
Since JM, throughout the trial, doesn't really dispute May 10th as the birthdate of the sex tape as JA claims to be, I think JA used a digital recorder (while on a speaker mode on Helio) on 5 different occasions, then transferred all of them, after carefully editing, uploading separately in 5 distinctive recordings, to her Helio on May 10.
Therefore the obvious splices we notice/changing subjects/silence or noise between those 5 parts are from transferring 5 separate recordings to her phone, not 1 long recording, found on the Helio.
She was very busy that day.
Then, in her journal on May 18, she makes it known the Helio was
stolen, not lost. Maybe she was about to publish the content and didn't want to get blamed. I didn't do it, the thief did it. It's never her fault, is it!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Happy New Year, everyone!:newyear::toastred: