trial day 33: the defense continues its case in chief #94
- Thread starter nursebeeme
- Start date
New Posts
-
IA IA - Joshua Eldridge, 50, Sioux City, 31 Oct 2024
- Latest: GuyfromCanada
- Status
Rosemary Pierce
New Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 1,398
- Reaction score
- 0
Heresay?
JusticeJunkie
New Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2013
- Messages
- 5,107
- Reaction score
- 2
No Juan, he didn't follow up on ANYTHING!!! His career is circling the drain as we speak.
wenwe4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2008
- Messages
- 9,499
- Reaction score
- 7,359
There were many images on that computer and there may or may not be reasons why . . .I saw that as irrelevant in this case. . . you indicated to me that the defendant told you lots of images of women's breasts on the computer?
yes
but I tell you there are none - that is an inconsistency
yes
does that give you pause given there are inconsistencies
no it was not germane to the examination
doesn't matter to you there are inconsistencies in this case as applied to the defendant
they didn't affect my opinion
whether or not they would give you pause to at least dig a little deeper in this case
yes some that were significant to the case . . . those I did not
You say I can look @ something and generally if they lie to me . . . about something you consider irrelevant then it is no harm no foul
obviously if it is important to the aspects to the case I am studying
I am not asking about that
I am trying to answer
Judge he is non-responsive
Pictures of breasts are not illegal - they did not come into the case I did not consider it.
are you done with your answer?
I have partially answered
Hypothetical irrelevant issue and client lied to you
Generally speaking not in this case , an individual lied to you about an irrelevant aspect you are telling us it doesn't matter to you because you deemed it was irrelevant.
if someone lied about a pertinent and important fact in the investigation I would consider it an important fact . . . .
they could lie to you 15 times about what you consider irrelevant . . if they were 50-60 points but I didn't see any other except this one
you didn't see any inconsistancies - yes or no
anal intercourse with only TA? . . . with Bobby Juarez and Daryl Brewer . ..
yes that would be important
if those facts are true would that affect your answer?
more info did come out but I had already written my report by then .. .in my report it reflects what she told me initially . .
you had not written the report when this issue came out . . . you wrote an addendum .
yes but my addendum was on the new material
new material - you wrote addendum but issue of anal intercourse came later
new material that came after your first addedendum . . . something you can add when something new came to light . . . involved an inconsistency . . . you chose to not write a new addendum -
I did write a new one but chose not include
you chose to conceal or ignore it
I ignored it - I didn't see it as relevant to my addendum
but it was relevant to your report
yes - it was my judgement call
you had formed a sort of relationship with the defendant because you liked her . . .why would you do that?
object
focus of my addendum was
isn't it true that you chose not to include these inconsistencies in your written report
yes
other things too
many other things
photos in the shower . . . she told you TA requested the photos
look @ interview w/Det Flores where that issue was addressed?
yes
was there discussion about the victim and his reluctance to have his picture taken?
objection!
(remember when JA said oh TA would not like pictures of him in the shower/bathroom . . . during the interrogation? . .. . . JM is ready with video clips I will just bet!)
yes
but I tell you there are none - that is an inconsistency
yes
does that give you pause given there are inconsistencies
no it was not germane to the examination
doesn't matter to you there are inconsistencies in this case as applied to the defendant
they didn't affect my opinion
whether or not they would give you pause to at least dig a little deeper in this case
yes some that were significant to the case . . . those I did not
You say I can look @ something and generally if they lie to me . . . about something you consider irrelevant then it is no harm no foul
obviously if it is important to the aspects to the case I am studying
I am not asking about that
I am trying to answer
Judge he is non-responsive
Pictures of breasts are not illegal - they did not come into the case I did not consider it.
are you done with your answer?
I have partially answered
Hypothetical irrelevant issue and client lied to you
Generally speaking not in this case , an individual lied to you about an irrelevant aspect you are telling us it doesn't matter to you because you deemed it was irrelevant.
if someone lied about a pertinent and important fact in the investigation I would consider it an important fact . . . .
they could lie to you 15 times about what you consider irrelevant . . if they were 50-60 points but I didn't see any other except this one
you didn't see any inconsistancies - yes or no
anal intercourse with only TA? . . . with Bobby Juarez and Daryl Brewer . ..
yes that would be important
if those facts are true would that affect your answer?
more info did come out but I had already written my report by then .. .in my report it reflects what she told me initially . .
you had not written the report when this issue came out . . . you wrote an addendum .
yes but my addendum was on the new material
new material - you wrote addendum but issue of anal intercourse came later
new material that came after your first addedendum . . . something you can add when something new came to light . . . involved an inconsistency . . . you chose to not write a new addendum -
I did write a new one but chose not include
you chose to conceal or ignore it
I ignored it - I didn't see it as relevant to my addendum
but it was relevant to your report
yes - it was my judgement call
you had formed a sort of relationship with the defendant because you liked her . . .why would you do that?
object
focus of my addendum was
isn't it true that you chose not to include these inconsistencies in your written report
yes
other things too
many other things
photos in the shower . . . she told you TA requested the photos
look @ interview w/Det Flores where that issue was addressed?
yes
was there discussion about the victim and his reluctance to have his picture taken?
objection!
(remember when JA said oh TA would not like pictures of him in the shower/bathroom . . . during the interrogation? . .. . . JM is ready with video clips I will just bet!)
laniefi
Inactive
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2008
- Messages
- 1,630
- Reaction score
- 19
Stick a fork in him folks...he is DONE!
Bravo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2011
- Messages
- 20,354
- Reaction score
- 64,584
Surely she doesn't mean the Ex Prez :floorlaugh:
Schuby
Under the thumb of The Man
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2013
- Messages
- 3,563
- Reaction score
- 3
Juan is making his brain scramble.
LotusPawprint
Moderately-known member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2012
- Messages
- 4,800
- Reaction score
- 7,223
He and the defense decide what strategy will most likely get their client off and they rule all of the incriminating carp as irrelevant. I think that's the policy.
ILikeToBendPages
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2010
- Messages
- 29,298
- Reaction score
- 76,306
Because we and the jury are just plain stupid folk and don't understand big words and diagnosis.
- Status