trial day 33: the defense continues its case in chief #94

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
somebody help me......let's list all the lies the good doc knew about:

anal sex
computer pics
Ninjas

Also, on June 4th she said she straddled TA and they took a picture having sex...which was false.
 
I swear they picked this "expert" up at some open casting call for actors.
And just once I want the judge's answer to "may we approach" be "NO! SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!"
 
Every day I ask myself, "Why is JA writing/drawing with a putt putt pencil?"
 
Um, didn't that hearsay come from Miss A.? Wasn't she the one who stated Travis was reluctant to have shower pix taken?
 
burnttoast.jpg

no butter!
 
Sounds like the good doctor is screwed!

And man did Jennifer jump up mighty quick when Juan started on this series of questions.

She's got to try to stop the bleeding some how. I didn't hear her objection - but someone said hearsay?
 
I wonder if the jury has noticed that they've got her chair swiveled all the way down to the floor again. Seems that ruse would have been given up after the "hand demo" that showed she clearly towers over her attorney by a good four inches.
 
Y'all, HLN has gone completely insane with the commercials. I know they have been, but I just need to scream about it.

HLN, Try to show some respect! This trial isn't all about you raking in the cash on ad revenue! Bottom feeders.
 
Wow, the 'doctor' can't answer yes or no. I wonder if Jodi learned that from him.
Unlike Jodi though, he does admit error, albeit reluctantly.

While they're on sidebar, does anybody know why KN was able to call a sidebar right off this morning, when it's JW's direct?
 
What was he talking about when there was a hearsay objection?

JA told Samuels that Travis wanted the shower photos. JM asked Samuels whether he had seen the video with detective Flores regarding that matter.
 
This is a belated post. Please excuse.

The HLN JA crime re enactment illustrated several crucial points.
1. A body slam to a tile floor would not allow the attack victim to immediately roll to the left,arise, compose herself, and run away.
2. For JA to “run away” from the scene of the body slam would have occurred as a standing attentive TA hovering over her would have been FROZEN IMMOBILE AND SIMPLY WATCHED JA SLIP BY HIM. NOT POSSIBLE.
3. Allowing for TA to run behind JA into the closet still would not permit JA to jump up on the shelf, grab a gun, come down with the gun in hand, swivel around, and retreat into the bathroom with the .25 gun firmly in both hands. TA would have immediately overwhelmed JA in the process of grabbing the gun.
4. There is NO WAY JA could attain the shooting angle, by which she shot the onrushing TA swooping in low with head turned slightly to his left, which in turn would have followed the bullet trajectory ie steep angle downward and to TA left. The HLN female defense attorney was DEAD WRONG in her explanation of what happened. Could NOT have happened her way.
5. The male HLN defense attorney in the demonstration pulled a “sleight of hand” when stepping on the shelf. He first gripped the upper shelf to support his weight, then stepped immediately next to the weight bearing strut. This action did NOT comport with JA testimony. Secondly even if this attorney did make the step up to reach the gun TA shoes would have been disturbed.
 
WildAboutTrial ‏@WildAboutTrial
A sidebar is called after an objection by Willmott. Dr. Samuels finally gets a chance to enjoy a swig of tap water. #JodiArias

BBM

LOL
 
What was the point of the addendum if he didn't add new information? :waitasec:

Oh he did add in new information just nothing that was incriminating to the defendant. He conveniently left that part out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
264
Guests online
337
Total visitors
601

Forum statistics

Threads
609,106
Messages
18,249,599
Members
234,536
Latest member
UrukHai
Back
Top