She said no sex assault by a family member - JA said she was awakened by TA for oral sex . . . she didn't consider it to be a sexual assault but it is under the law
objection - he is not a lawyer
No but I have done a lot of court
Object - prosecutor wants to voire dire re: his legal degree
did you work with sexually violent preditors . . . certain deviant acts . . .part of the training - legal laws for evaluations for sexually violent preditors must have knowledge of the law . .
is it illegal to have intercourse with someone with out their consent
absolutely
important with ja thinks?
that is most important
back to the test
sexual assault by a stranger - no
no on 7,8,9,10,11
could someone on this particular test answer yes and lie
yes and their scores would go up accordingly
if she answered more yes answers would her scores up?
yes
she answered no
she specified . . .repeated emotional and psychological abuse . . .
Samuels asked about that later on . . . .she was talking about TA's reported physical assault and verbal abuse during their time together . . . . based upon the event on how she feels - she felt emotional trauma with these but not when TA had oral sex with her without consent . . .no she was not feeling emotional trauma . . if she answered on 5 yes her score would go up
#14 most traumatic was endorsing #4 . . . non sexual assault by a stranger.
did you ask her what she meant particularly
at that point she was sticking to the intruder story - 2 of them in the house that threatened her life
does that particular incident - intruders she is talking about change her score in anyway -no it would affect therapy but I wasn't providing therapy. . .. . . . strangers involved in the trauma not the fact she was attacked when she was younger
objection
approach