trial day 35: the defense continues its case in chief #100

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
I agree also. But I suppose it can "ingrain" in jurors heads and be bias?

I think the family should be allowed to have the ribbons on in court. I would see a problem if the entire courtroom, with the exception of JA's family, has them on, which they did. Who wouldn't want to support Travis? I'm glad the supporters took them off. I believe some of the media was wearing them as well. Only Travis's family should be allowed to have them on during the proceedings. :twocents:
 
Any word on what <mod snip> was caught smuggling out of the courtroom? Did the Mutt get in trouble?
 
Exactly. I also fail to see how this could become an issue on appeal. "Dear Court Of Appeals: The victim's family wore ribbons to support their loved one and that was SO UNFAIR TO ME! ::hairflip::"

No. I don't think so.

I think there was an appeal at another trial over the spectators wearing buttons with the victims picture on it. It went up to the higher courts I believe, and I wish I could remember the name of the case.
 
The killer is the definition of evil. Getting worse after the murder and spending years in jail! A remorseful person would be getting better! She gets more evil by the day!

Fry her already.
 
If we're talking in strictly a legal sense here, 'victim' ribbons should not be worn in view of the jury. As others have said, it could be a potential appeal issue, and in all actuality could sway a juror, even if that juror doesn't realize it. As reviled as the defendant is, she still deserves a fair trial.
 
Imagine Jodi passing notes!!!! Why did the M. specialist help her?

Dear Mom,
Get me out of here!!!
Love,
J
 
This is for *us* because she got caught passing notes.

Our FU will come in the form of a guilty of murder in the first degree verdict. :great:

Sorry Jodi we're just not that into you
 
This morning, as court was getting started, Wilmott was bustling around Miss Thing, clearing an area all around her on the desk, taking things out of her reach. By the time Wilmott was done, the ONLY things within the reach of JA were a SINGLE styrofoam cup and a piece of paper. And probably a golf pencil.

Oh, that's so demeaning to her!! Is it wrong that I giggled when I read this? Can they stick her in a corner next with her nose against the wall? ;p
 
Back from work... Ok so from what I heard today, Doc Samuels jury questions seem to disqualify his diagnosis?

Not to mention the man himself...

"Do you always make this many mistakes in your evaluations?"

"Isn't your evaluation necessarily based on lies since that's all the defendant's told you?"

"Aren't you a little too fond of the defendant?"

"Are you a completely impartial and objective third party?" [Answer: I try to be, always.]

"Dissociative amnesia? Did you double-check your diagnosis? Because it looks more like selective amnesia from the jury box."

Yes, I paraphrased, but there were some real zingers there...
 
This screenshot taken when standing for jury before court started this morning, staring at TA's family.
This is why I've lost any and all respect for the DT...

picture.php
 
Imagine Jodi passing notes!!!! Why did the M. specialist help her?

Dear Mom,
Get me out of here!!!
Love,
J

More like

Dear Mom,
You f....d up. Must talk ASAP so we can fix this.
Love,
Your peace loving daughter Jodi
 
I am kind of worried about the family's decision to keep the ribbons on. Although I sympathize, and would probably do the same thing if it was my brother, I am worried that it could become an appeals issue down the line.

That's what we were told, concerning our shirts, so we opted not to wear them to the trial.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
180
Guests online
1,156
Total visitors
1,336

Forum statistics

Threads
602,127
Messages
18,135,169
Members
231,244
Latest member
HollyMcKee
Back
Top