HLN overanalyzes everything... for me the point of the 'keynote' vs 'breakout keynote' is that while to some it may not be a huge deal on her CV it is the fact that she finds it ok to stretch the truth, or as JM has shown, has her own personal idea of what is 'truthful' based on her own 'context'. Obviously because keynote was in the 'context' of keynote breakout, she chose to omit the breakout, and was fine with that. Everything is based on her perception, and not necessarily facts. Like she herself said, she doesnt know if there was further communications, and additional history on people she is making claims on. If she is going to keep speaking to patterns of behavior, then JA should have been a red flag from the start!
While sometimes it seems frustrating to get her to answer, I think the interaction is very telling. I get tired of TH saying JM is attacking ALV. He is not attacking her, he is asking questions to help get justice. JM is being attacked by these annoying hostile witnesses.