The name is not correct . . .
based upon information told to me
someone else could come up with a different determination
on the name
I suppose
on which name is accurate
a B/S story - someone came over to Groovy Tuesday - woman came up to defendant and told her TA had been having relationship with Lisa Andrews. . . . .your wrote it down in your notes and decided the story was true.
that was not a real significant piece of information .. .
significant enough to write it down
I write notes to myself . . .
accurate as possibly can
yes
something strikes you - you write down . . . if important enough to write down
context . . . where she worked?
Ruby Tuesdays
some person gives her story . . .
a woman named Maria or Marie . . . her last name not significant
we have Michelle and Alayna . . . .
I have name Marie . . .
3 potential different names given to TA?
I don't think Marie was given I think he said Michelle
that would be a lie?
no
I am not sure what you are saying . .. could be a mistake could be Michelle and he meant Marie . .
you just gave a example of why you don't just rely on writing right?
I think that I rely . . . if I have preponderance of writing . . . . I read an email from his sister, his writing, things he wrote I had opportunity to read
are you done with your answer?
yes
illustrated one of the flaws reading what is reading
a name came be different?
you were saying a mistake for Mr. Alexander
I said he could have
mistake was his not the defendant's
I don't know if the name was so important . . . marie, michelle . . . don't know why so important to you frankly
judge will you admonish the witness?
just answer the question don't add
only if you rely on 1 written word
mistakes can be made in the writing
yes
you just demonstrated it when you said it could have been a mistake . . . why chose TA as the one making a mistake
I didn't say he did . . .it wasn't a key issue
my question why couldn't it have been the defendant that could have made mistake or lied
I could say that to you now if you like
Could you please admonish the defendant?
overruled
you have a bias against TA
no I don't
your fall back was TA made a mistake
you miscarchterize what I say . . .I did say TA could have made a mistake
you are familiar with Matthew McCartney
yes
how the defendant found out MM involved with another individual . . . Bianca . . . how JA came to know about Bianca and what she did in response to that?
not how she came to know but what she did
she was working @ Applebees and while working there two girls came in
Objection
Approach!!!
running to the bench (JW)
