trial day 44: the defense continues its case in chief #132

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
So Alyce believes that since Travis did nothing about the stalking he was not being stalked..and she disregarded it. So when Jodi claims abuse but told no one and did nothing about it why would she believe jodi...Obvious bias
 
People who are sexually abused for reals, and/or raped don't always take action. PS not taking action against abuse was your buddy Jodi's defense, . Just saying.
 
"Does the word stalking appear anywhere else on this page" calls solely for a yes or no answer. Threaten this woman with contempt. If she does it again make her eat dinner with Wilmott again.
 
OMG...now blaming Travis for "taking no action" with regard to JA's stalking....

I might need to turn this off today. :furious:

Why doesn't that standard apply to Jodi and her DV? Why is she given a pass for not getting and staying away but Travis does not?

She is so obvious.
 
ALV needs to understand TA was slaughtered by the same woman he said was stalking him.
 
I have now entered...Alyce's World...where definitions change on a whim, and only she can interpret the continuum.
 
Why does JW always slide her hand from left to right across the top of the judge's desk during sidebars?

Sliding the microphone so she can speak into it for the court reporter to hear. They slide it back and forth between them as they speak. I think.
 
But she's going about in a way that will ensure she is hurt professionally. She doesn't get it or Rasputin Jodi has her so under her thumb she's been sent to CrazyTown and filled with FOG. Idiotic.

I don't even think this is about JA anymore. It's about saving face and reputation and keeping those high paying gigs coming in.
 
Holy moly. I never NEVER use the 'c' word but I tell ya, I am internally screaming that word at this woman.
What a defiant disgrace to all women. It's one thing to be a strong woman but to be an indignant, arrogant and ignorant one behind a title 'service to others' is illegal!!
 
I think it's ridiculous that ALV tries to qualify every single answer and needs to give HER definition of whatever the phrase in question is. We as a society have a common definition of what we feel stalking is, and it's quite in line with what the law states stalking is. So WHY is ALV trying to use a different definition. She's such an embarrassment.
 
OMG. May the foremothers forgive her. Now every battered person has to have "taken action" before they can be believed?
 
So it would be okay for me to go into other people's homes, watch through their windows, go through their garbage....phones...computers, slash their tires, etc. and it's not stalking if my target doesn't do anything about it?
huh?
 
ALVs favorite response..It is not a yes or no answer..it is a ramble on answer so that i can twist the facts around to make JA look like a victim"

Yes, with "Mr. Martinez" sarcastically thrown in, too.
 
I had to catch up on youtube from yesterday. I cannot believe that TA's family can't wear ribbons to remember their loved one but that murderous, beady-eyed, liar can sit at that table and blurt out 'sustained'. SMDH

Wait did I miss something??? Did the defense finally succeed in making them remove the ribbons?
 
Somethings up...Juan just pulled something out of his files!
 
isn't this two fold then? how can we believe Jodi was abused if she took no action because of the abuse?

she didn't call police
she didn't seek medical care
she didn't stop seeing travis
she didn't tell anyone
she continues sleeping with travis

she took NO action to stop it, how can we believe she was abused? her word is obviously NOT sufficient
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
229
Total visitors
363

Forum statistics

Threads
609,383
Messages
18,253,503
Members
234,648
Latest member
WhereTheWildThingsAre
Back
Top