She reviewed transcripts of interviews with other witnesses. If she did separate interviews with them would they be expected to say something different than what they said the first time to LE or the prosecutor? And if they did, would that be more or less credible? I have no issue with her relying on sworn statements or statements to LE. That would be typical and expected.
"Death." <--- it's just a one word sentence!
I want to know why ALV thinks that stalking victims have to be held to a standard, but DV victims are forgiven for not holding to a certain standard?
Both are horrific, I'm sure, but why is it that a stalking victim has to take drastic measure to prove that they were stalked? If there are reasons that a DV victim is afraid to leave a situation, then there are also reason why a stalking victim is afraid to rile the stalker.
As it takes time for a DV person to realize what is happening to them, it also takes time for a person to realize that someone is stalking them. It could take months for a stalking victim to realize that their "friend" is invading their privacy or showing up wherever they are, or have put a tracking GPS on them, etc and so on. Just like a DV person can feel that they can reason with their abuser and that it doesn't happen all the time, why can't a stalking person think that they have reasoned with their "friend" or lover and has also concluded that the behavior would stop?
I don't take away from DV victims. I just don't think it's fair to take away from stalking victims. Since they compared the two today, I have to raise these questions.
If you cut a tendon, it usually requires sewing it back together, splint and physical therapy. Must have a doctor take of it.
Wouldn't a break be a crooked finger to the left or right...with an un-natural stiffness to it? Just remembering seeing a guy's finger that had been broken and not properly set, would not bend.
do you think they are going to play more sex tapes with the witness they are calling next ..is that why the sister was crying today
The defense's so called recreation in 42 seconds was a JOKE. They left out major time consuming things, like him yelling at her about the camera, the body slam, closing the door and then opening the door of the closet.
And did you notice how SLOWLY the man followed behind her 'in chase.' Travis was supposedly in a murderous rage, so why did the recreation show him in slow motion?
A distinct example I can think of is Rosie O'Donnell while she had her daytime talk show cut a finger tendon and had it properly attended to medically and her finger was never the same, neither laid right, smooth or moved the same and she repeatedly showed it to the audience. I think of that every time I see ja's finger.
I agree completely that Arias's words are meaningless. And I also agree that her writing is fantasy; her journals were written with a courtroom audience in mind.I can't imagine EITHER side being interested in ANYTHING she's written in journals since arrested because it's clearly established they are FANTASY. They only matter to JA because they are HER reality and no one elses, and don't even have a passing acquaintance to Reality. She lies in her journals. Period. They are of no use to anyone.
Hi, diid you hear they will cover the Trayvon Martin case in June? I heard Vinnie report it will be on HLN.. sorta looks like they switched channels.:floorlaugh:It is the crying Judge.lol..I gave up on it. Vinnie is such an intelligent man, he should have a better postion. He is/was a prosecutor. :seeya:
PATTERNS, Kamille. We were looking for PATTERNS today. But Alyce couldn't find any (no surprise there). :floorlaugh:
ANYONE that can look at their own diagnostic criteria and REFUSE to simply state YES OR NO to seeing the word 'stalking' in the column, just simply likes to argue for the sake of it.
I think there's a DSM # for that somewhere. How completely aggravating.
As always...MHOO
I don't know how anyone could see the autopsy photos and still think Jodi was justified when she murdered Travis.
I don't think Travis was perfect, but no one is. He may have been a jerk to her. Even if he did everything she says (I don't think he did) he still did not deserve what she did to him! So he said some mean things to her....guess what it happens all the time to people. Most people just suck it up and move on. She is not the first person to be used.....not an excuse for murder.
The "experts" that have testified for Jodi still haven't said anything that explains why she brutally murdered him. She was in a fog, ok so what will stop her from going into another fog and killing some more? She was abused (I don't considered the relationship abusive, but whatever) but she still wouldn't stay away from her abuser. What will stop her from killing someone else who yells at her and makes her feel bad? Even if her parents did "abuse" her like she says so many people have been through much worse. I don't think it has anything to do with what she did to Travis.
Jodi is sick. Not the kind of sick where mental health professionals can help you. Not the kind of sick where people can support you and love you through it. She is cold blooded killer sick. The type of person who can't be helped, doesn't want help and she is actually sick enough to think she is ok. She thinks killing him was ok. She thinks putting him on trial and continuing to hurt his family and friends is ok. She thinks lying is ok.
I hope this trial ends soon. I hope justice is served. There is a special place in hell for people like her and a special place with the angels for people like Travis.
ANYONE that can look at their own diagnostic criteria and REFUSE to simply state YES OR NO to seeing the word 'stalking' in the column, just simply likes to argue for the sake of it.
I think there's a DSM # for that somewhere. How completely aggravating.
As always...MHOO