WildAboutTrial @WildAboutTrial
Willmott is here in a vomity green colored outfit. .she just strutted down the tan carpet like it was the academy awards. #JodiArias
QUESTION
what does it mean when you hit the "play" button on AZ central and get nothing....same on WAT??? just getting black screen?????? my computer dh just left and now I'm pondering.....TIA :seeya:
HLN talking about the rise in STD's among senior citizens!
OMG! :giggle: Saying the kids need to talk to their parents about protection!
I heard about this a few years ago when we were putting my grandmother into an assisted care place. Alot of sexually active seniors out there...waaaaaay more than you'd guess.
Good Morning Friends
It's a fact! I live a few miles from a very large retirement community here in Florida. They are infamous for having a high rate of STDs. Oh grandma! And your grandbabies thought you were out playing shuffleboard...lolz.
I live in a retirement community, too, but mine is sedate in comparison.
Oh, no. huh uh. that whole manslaughter motion. BULLSPIT! BULLSPIT I SAY.
This judge better show some backbone and tell the DT that enough is enough is enough. They've had years to try and formulate a defense. They went with DV and self defense. Period. They should not be allowed to halfway through the longest danged trial of the century, once they've figured out they are loosing on that Defense, change their defense to "crime of passion" blah blah blah just because JM has blown their DV carpola out of the water.
At some point this must end. I am livid.
Refresh the page? WAT is showing the seal.
I'm finding it amusing that the defence team are adding this 'crime of passion' to the list of findings.
The jury will never realise the irony (too much is kept from them, IMO), but Nurmi is now announcing to the whole world that his client lied on the stand about self-defence, which to me is also an admission that there was no physical abuse to cause her to fear for her life, and no pedophilia incident to set off the physical abuse.
Wherein lies the truth, Mr. Nurmi?
They should start passing out condoms in the nursing homes.
My PC is making all kinds of noises like it's trying to run away.
Here's a bit from that article:
The state trial court found that Dr. Geffner's affidavit lacked credibility for three reasons: (1) the evaluation, which makes conclusions as to Clark's conduct in 1987, was conducted five years later, in 1992; (2) Dr. Geffner did not review the court records or a transcript of the trial testimony; and (3) Dr. Geffner relied upon records from Clark's childhood in Pennsylvania, with no records since 1976, and upon hearsay information supplied by Clark's attorneys, with no independent verification of the information, and interviews with Clark. The state court further found that, even if credible, Dr. Geffner's affidavit does not support a conclusion that Clark was either incompetent or insane at the time of the murders, or that he did not act deliberately within the meaning of the first special issue. The state court noted that Clark testified that he had not taken any drugs on the day of the murders, and found that Clark's trial counsel had no indication that Clark was suffering from drug withdrawal at the time of the murders. Moreover, the state court pointed out that, in any event, evidence that Clark was acting under a drug-induced delusion when he committed the murders would have been immaterial to an insanity defense and "would not have conflicted with the overwhelming evidence of deliberateness."
NO PROB FOR JUAN