Tulessa - Here they are (GRAPHIC WARNING!)
Good evening everyone!
:seeya:
From JVM's show....another juror gone???
:banghead:
NG starting now...the State rests!
I think if a television show is going to follow a case they should do it accurately so the viewers can actually form an opinion. Nothing wrong with showing viewers crime scene and autopsy photos if at the same time we can ask jurors to make a decision on Jodi's life. The justice system is meant to be open and the media needs access.
All IMO
I can't stand Dr Drew...don't watch anymore ... But for reasons other than the above.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I know right! Mr. Softail always says, you know she wont get the DP right?!
:slap: Idiot! :giggle:
I do love him dearly, but still.... :slapfight:
Soneone, sorry I forgot who, said when she gets to prison she should send her a card from Cancun....as much as I hate going to MX I would go just to send her a postcard fro Cancun and sign it 'Travis' friend'
Along with the helmet hair!
:floorlaugh:
Like when DH stood in the kitchen doorway, watching me pour pancake syrup on the floor and side kick an uncooked rigatoni noodle into the puddle......doing my own casing test......
He just asked "when you're done, may I come in and get some ice cream?"
He did warn the viewers. He seems to think we need to see the "depravity" of the crime.Good Chr*st!
They just freaking SHOWED the autopsy pic on DD! So not necessary!
Tasteless!
I am changing channels to watch the draft now. Shame on DD.![]()
She hasn't been talked about a lot. But one of his friends mentioned that he had bought her an engagement ring. Which Arias supposedly stole from him. He was going to trade it in for a ring for Lisa if that relationship had worked out for them.
Maybe answered already, but if not: Deanna testified that after Travis and Linda broke up (and she left the state) in early 2002, Travis and Deanna got together again.
She is pro defense on every show other than Nancy G- then she agrees with everything Nancy says... I stopped watching her flip flop during the Casey
Anthony trial. It was embarrassing.
Seriously? Wow.
I thought the ring was for Deanna, but then I was reminded about Linda, but had no idea he was also going to propose to Lisa.
What about Mimi?
All these engagement rings must be eating away at Jodi! :floorlaugh:
Not a one for HER!
JA's Grandmother has a blue ribbon pin on it court, anyone know what that is for?
Video Link At Bottom On How Jodi Killed Travis Alexander By Her Own Words.
#1 Jodi says Travis said (kill you *****) after she shot him in the head and she broke free.
ME said that Travis would not have been able say or do anything immediately after being shot.
M.E said either the throat slitting or the gunshot to the head would cause incapacitation immediately. The stab wound to the chest that cut the return artery would have likely allowed Travis to be conscious enough to walk for a few seconds.
While M.E was testifying Jodi looked at every autopsy photo that was shown, she had to see each and every one of them.
M.E says by being shot in the head as Travis had done to him he would have been incapacitated immediately after shot to the head.
This means Travis could not have chased after Jodi after being shot in the head.
The M.E said the bullet had to have passed through the front of the brain, there was no way the bullet could have missed the brain.
M.E said the defensive wounds would have to have come when he was still alive.
This video reference to how the murder was done is probably exactly right, watch for your self then decide.
The following Youtube reference is depicts a theory of how Jodi Arias killed Travis Alexander based on the forensic evidence & her own statements to the police.
It contains graphic testimony and photos.
VIEWER DISCRETION IS ADVISED.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mXlwTZoMzQ
Timelines for TA and DR overlaps...only reason I was asking...
The stab wounds to the back are enough to destroy the self-defense defense, in my mind, let alone anything else. I mean, how do you reconcile that? There's no way. None.
just like DD. So, they're actually getting a twofer-he's also an expert in domestic abuse, the kind only experts like him and Alyce can see.
Legally, I am stunned actually, that they are allowed to do this. They had two experts, the state one. The defense knew what DD was going to testify to. Samuels was a Psychologist, just like DD. In a "normal" case they couldn't bring anyone back as they already knew the testimony and had chosen how they wanted to present the case. If, in such a "normal" case there was some new evidence that needed to be addressed they would be able to recall their Psychologist professional, the one they picked. That he had been previously discredited by Juan is not a legal basis to allow them a third expert.
I am still anxiously awaiting any explanation by an AZ trial lawyer as to how this can happen.
The stab wounds to the back are enough to destroy the self-defense defense, in my mind, let alone anything else. I mean, how do you reconcile that? There's no way. None.