Trial Discussion Thread #12 - 14.03.24, Day 14

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Can OP get a refund? Just wondering because it doesn't seem that he is getting what he bargained for! :floorlaugh:
 
Fact is, imo, and imbw, to expect all ear witness are going to recall everything they heard that traumatic night, and to all hear exactly the same is pie in the sky. Each will hear differently. It will depend on each person's hearing, on what they were paying more attention to at a given moment, on whether they were facing left or right or looking out or in, on whether a gust of wind went by and the noise momentarily changed direction, etc. etc. etc.

I don't really understand why it is so significant the number of "shots" each heard either, and much less still if the defence is trying to claim double taps which I would think it would be harder to distinguish one from the other.

It isn't. No matter, what witnesses recalling and being asked to remember how many gunshots they heard is never going to yield an exact and consistent answer across the board. Most of the time they just guesstimate and the guesstimation is usually all over the place.
 
It is her hand in the photo, and she said she wasn't in the room when it was taken.

OW: Yet again another mistake on your part, do you accept that?
 
Lol.

I warned you all about the tie-backs! :floorlaugh:
 
there were 2 sets of pics taken. one she was in, this one, but not the series to be presented to court.. they were not taken on the same day.


he is impugning her memory skills.. she actually teaches memory training.

back to Afrikaans word. slaa.. versus.. another word..

she is familiar with gunshot. the 2nd . floof kilaber.. I am reading this as flatter sound. I dunno .

she says, they sounded exactly the same. same rapidity..


he has finished. he got nowhere. nowhere.

redirect from Nel


pic 936..
 
Another witness who will not concede that other possibilities exist
 
Ah no...witness just went on about the memory classes she has had...how it's related to emotion etc!

Disaster. Too much info. She used it to explain the curtains but now he's gone straight on to the sound of shots.
 
curtains from nel..

you can see your bedside table with the lamp>?? yes..

and there is the chair, that keeps the door open.

yuoo can see the bathroom window of Oscars, from your bed. yes.

now. Oscar has an ultraviolet light, . its a purple light. sometimes we do have to close the curtains, because the light is penetrative even to my house.

when you heard the first shot>??>>> the light was on a simultaneous observation.

time lapse. directly after, milliseconds, milliseconds. the woman screaming.

the office yu were in with other witness.??


we were not allowed to discuss with each other we were monitored by two very effficent MPA's,, no one was allowed to discuss.

the judge thanks Mrs Annete Stipp.

FRANCOIS MULLER UP
 
Nel is leading her to explain how the forensic lights in OP's house were so visible, she had to close the curtains. Kind of makes clear she could see.

Now on to sound of shots. Time lapse between sounds of shots and screams. 'Milliseconds between last (of first set of shots) and commencement of screaming.

Nel has quick question about discussion of evidence and it's all over!

Cpt M up now.
 
Another witness who will not concede that other possibilities exist

If you heard 3 rapid gunshots could you concede that it could be the sound of a cricket bat hitting a door?, if it seemed to you to be impossible?.
 
Nel: You received four cells; two iphones, two blackberries and 2 iphones and macbook on 15th Feb from Botha?
 
Interesting Roux has been absent all morning - or at least I have not noticed him in court. Whatever came up last week has obviously 'stirred his stumps'. I see he is back now. No doubt regretting leaving Oldie to cross-examine Mrs Stipp.
 
Francois. a sort of cuddly kind of bloke. crisp shirt. nice suit. well spoken, English testimony.

fran received 4 phones, 2 blackberries, iphones, 2 ipads, one MacBook.

he worked on the cell phones.

and these are those phones?? yes


were you able to indentify this number??

he goes thru the procedure of identifying the numbers.

when he got them, it was marked as belonging to Oscar..

when he gets on he takes out the sim card. to remove it from the network. so there is no tampering, and no movement of the device..

because he removed the simcard from each device. he then has to established what the number is.

he goes into REEVAS phone to establish OSCARS number.
 
Interesting Roux has been absent all morning - or at least I have not noticed him in court. Whatever came up last week has obviously 'stirred his stumps'. I see he is back now. No doubt regretting leaving Oldie to cross-examine Mrs Stipp.

From what I saw, Roux was there but completely blocked from the camera by OW except when OW moved to one side or bent over.
 
He identified Reeva's number through OP's iphone somehow. Removed sims so no outside tampering. Took OP's last dialled numbers and from there established Reeva's number, and to establish OP's number, went through Reeva's.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
181
Guests online
219
Total visitors
400

Forum statistics

Threads
608,546
Messages
18,241,049
Members
234,397
Latest member
Napqueenxoxo
Back
Top