Yeah, I do believe that much of what Nel did today was simply try to make OP as uncomfortable as possible and inflict psychic pain through mockery, sarcasm, badgering, arguing, and false assumptions. There's no other explanation for much of it because it certainly wasn't substantive or informative of anything.
There's no limit to cross examination and it's often much longer than direct examination. I hope that what we saw today was just Day One tactics to shake things up and that the remainder of his cross examination will be more substantive and less confusing. If he's got some evidence to show OP's lying, let's hear it. If he can counter OP's account, then put it to him and watch him squirm - but that's not what today was. Today was just bullying.
Yes, more of making the killer out as the victim. Now he's the victim of bullying.
This must indicate the defense case is really swirling down the drain every time the killer opens his mouth.
Nel, who is doing his job, is the bad guy.
Pistorius, who according to his own story, shot his girlfriend because she went to go pee and he was too stupid to realize it, is the victim.
Admitted killer is being tortured and bullied by some lawyer's questions that he is required by law to answer. :boohoo: