jassy writer
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2014
- Messages
- 150
- Reaction score
- 0
What I want to know, and what I am sure Nel will want to know as well, is:
Why did this defence expert do the sound tests outdoors on a shooting range?
He was right there, in OP's house, to do the light test. Why not attach a door to the toilet and do the sound test with the cricket bat on site?
My feeling is that they tried this and the results were less conclusive / dramatic / loud than the noise of a cricket bat in the open. Therefore they are using this as "proof".
Why did this defence expert do the sound tests outdoors on a shooting range?
He was right there, in OP's house, to do the light test. Why not attach a door to the toilet and do the sound test with the cricket bat on site?
My feeling is that they tried this and the results were less conclusive / dramatic / loud than the noise of a cricket bat in the open. Therefore they are using this as "proof".