Just pondering the possibility . . .
There was argument/disagreement. Reeva slept in spare bedroom. Early hours, Reeva did go to the bathroom. Oscar thought intruder . . the rest unfolds.
His hedging at times whilst on the stand possibly due to if he says they had argued etc, he'd immediately be deemed guilty??
Wouldn't he have then shot her in the spare bedroom's bathroom? OP's own testimony stated he had his own bedroom locked down with a cricket bat wedged into the door for added security, unless you think she somehow managed to climb up to his bathroom window just to use his loo with the "broken" toilet room light, or did he chase her from the spare bedroom into his toilet room all the while still thinking she was an intruder?
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/multimedia/archive/00386/122359026__386289b.jpg
![122359026__386289b.jpg](/forums/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thetimes.co.uk%2Ftto%2Fmultimedia%2Farchive%2F00386%2F122359026__386289b.jpg&hash=5b94a380149f1f9058e0f130e06864b5)