Viper
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2014
- Messages
- 1,812
- Reaction score
- 1
It didn't work
Premature post. Obviously. :floorlaugh:
It didn't work
Has anyone seen Arnu Fourie's statement on the matter?
http://ewn.co.za/2014/07/02/Oscar-Pistorius-Arnu-Fourie-releases-statement
"He said he wanted to rest and recover on his own in preparation for the race.
This is in contrast to statements made to O'Sullivan which was published in the article."
That has never been established as a certainty, only the more probable firing position, the second possible firing position being on his legs but holding the firearm with a bent elbow-- just as Oscar himself described IIRC.
Has anyone seen Arnu Fourie's statement on the matter?
http://ewn.co.za/2014/07/02/Oscar-Pistorius-Arnu-Fourie-releases-statement
"He said he wanted to rest and recover on his own in preparation for the race.
This is in contrast to statements made to O'Sullivan which was published in the article."
They make sense to me. This witness is trying to squirm out of truthfully answering about when he was told about the 'magazine rack.'Really, most of Nel's questions do not make sense.
The tweet was read out in court yesterday. What was actually said was never in dispute until OP came to court though. When it was originally reported about the roommate incident, Arnu Fourie said he couldn't remember saying it so phoned up Mr O'Sullivan who confirmed what he said and told him that he'd recorded it and Arnu Fourie was happy to accept that. Now it's got to court Arnu Fourie asked Mr O'Sullivan to play the recording but unfortunately Mr O'Sullivan can't prove it now as he got mugged and the recording was stolen.
Well, we are still stuck on the use of 'subsequent' in Prof's report.