Zuri
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2013
- Messages
- 8,782
- Reaction score
- 119
This is my take on OP's defense:
In the beginning, OP hears a noise and grabs his pistol. He's the man, so of course he has to protect his girlfriend, and since he's on his stumps, he feels vulnerable and has to protect himself. So in full protection mode, he chivalrously puts himself between Reeva and the danger. He hears movement, feels trapped inside his locked bedroom, so he "fires shots at the door," as specifically stated in his bail application. With no uncertainty, he intentionally fires at the door because, after all, he was protecting Reeva and himself and acting in self defense.
But then OP gets on the stand. He was terrified. He didn't aim. He didn't have time to think. Before he knew it he had fired four rounds of zombie stoppers into a tiny toilet cubicle. Nel asks, "You didn't intend to fire four shots into the door?" "No milady, I did not."
Oh dear.
Now Roux is forced to take a different route because his client doesn't even know what his own damn defense is.
Enter Vorster. Amputation of OP's lower legs was a "traumatic assault," losing his mother at age 14 was devastating, he has a higher level of concern regarding crime and his safety than the average South African, and he has GAD, which may have played a role in OP's actions the night he shot and killed Reeva.
GAD? Nel is all over this like white on rice. He wants OP immediately sent to a mental health institution for a psychiatric evaluation.
Whoops.
NO! NO! NO! Roux objects! He argues in vain against the referral.
No dice. Referral approved.
30 days later - No GAD! No mental disorder! No diminished capacity!
Uh oh. Now what? Roux needs to figure out another way to support OP's testimony.
In comes OP's sports doctor, who treats the court to a thorough explanation of the startle/fight/flight/freeze response, which is unequivocally the length of the average doctoral dissertation. Is his purpose to confuse the court? Who knows! But he reinforces how vulnerable OP is and how he's easily startled, so it's working well enough. But then, when Nel asks him why he thinks OP shot at the door, he replies, "To nullify the threat."
Geeze Louise! That's clear intent!
Oh well. Roux is out of options, so he rests his case.
Thank you for posting this! By simply taking it all down to basics, you very aptly explained his defense in a nutshell.