Trial Discussion Thread #51 - 14.11.9, Day 41 ~announcement of the verdict~

Welcome to Websleuths!
Click to learn how to make a missing person's thread

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
J: Crt must avoid attaching too much weight to such dishonest testimony...assuming it means guilt
 
but she is gonna forgive him for being evasive.... * ....
 
I would fall over laughing if she said "The accused is full of ****"
 
Disturbing issues - why he didn't check with deceased when he heard the window, etc.
 
if an accused is 'untruthful'... then surely his version should be seriously questioned, or not be accepted
 
Must avoid attaching too much weight to the testimony (aka) credibility of the accused? For real?? smh
 
Rejects defense explanation for OP's poor performance on the witness stand

Masipa: The conclusion that if a witness tells an untruth he must be guilty is not helpful. Thank you - I got ridiculed for saying the same a few weeks ago.
 
Question as to why OP fired 4 shots instead of just 1
 
Judge now setting out how unreasonable idea Reeva did ot answer and why OP shot 4 times instead if just once.
 
What is NOT conjecture is that he armed himself
He was not truthful about his intentions
He was clearly not candid with the court
 
Accused was not honest when he said he had no intention to shoot anyone, but that doesn't necessarily mean he is guilty
 
J: Ccused clrly not candid with crt when he said he had no intention to shoot
 
yes.....he armed himself......haha not truthful....not candid with the court
 
I wonder what her view will be on an escape route or phoning security, the police or even activating the alarm?
 
J: Onus- no onus rests with accused to convince crt of truth of evidence???
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
1,353
Total visitors
1,499

Forum statistics

Threads
606,320
Messages
18,201,973
Members
233,810
Latest member
WhokilledBettie?
Back
Top