Estelle
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2009
- Messages
- 6,727
- Reaction score
- 18,382
One cannot corrupt an already corrupt soul.
The corrupt do not want to reform.
And hope? LOL
The corrupt are the destroyers of hope.
Would Masipa and Henzen-du Toit be so reluctant to bring down the righteous hammer if Oscar had murdered THEIR sister, daughter, granddaughter, best friend? Their entire perspective would do a total 180, wouldnt it?
Lets face it - with very rare exceptions, the judiciary exists in their own alternate reality, safely insulated from Real Life. Violent crime happens to others, to those people. Crime doesnt personally affect them - they can afford to be compassionate and magnanimous and even experimental with the law when theyve got zero skin in the game.
They hand down sage decrees, dressed up in fancy legalese that sound great on paper but have nothing whatsoever to do with justice.
Second chances and suspended sentences and holistic and reform and rehabilitation and bleeding-heart platitudes are easy when its someone elses horrific nightmare.
Crime scene photos are sterile, they never do the actual brutality justice; testimony only goes so far in painting the whole picture. One must stand in the place of the victim, both figuratively and literally.
At the very least, Masipa and her assessors should have each taken the elevator down from their ivory tower to physically stand alone in that tiny, dark, locked toilet - then imagine a dear loved one in their place, terrified, mangled, bleeding, dead ... shot to death by Oscar Pistorius. Perhaps the shattered, bloody tiles, bashed metal and smashed doors would have whispered the truth in their ears.
INJUSTICE IS A TOTAL FAILURE OF IMAGINATION.
It seeks to separate you from me from all of us, to justify selfish bias, to twist and circumvent the law to satisfy ones narrow ideals and agenda. It speaks of the victim, the deceased ... very rarely by her name - REEVA. She becomes little more than an abstract, caught in the judicial machinery. The cold, abstract rule of law must be tempered by making cases personal, viewing the deceased as a once warm, living, breathing, feeling human being with a real name, a real smile, real dreams, an existence as real as their own.
Entire families are traumatized, sometimes broken beyond repair ... they, too, are victims in their own right.
One must put oneself in the shoes of Reeva and her family. It could so easily have been MY loved one. One then instantly sees murderous violence in a stark new light - it becomes personal, immediate, a wrong that must be corrected. A murder is not just a criminal offense against the deceased - it is an offense against ALL. Yes, we should all take it personally. No judge ever became just or wise simply by reading and applying laws and statutes - anyone can do that. Real lives, real victims, real families should be the prism which the law must pass through to reach true justice.
Reeva Steenkamp should have been the prism through which Masipa walked.
Her misguided (if sincere) thirst for remorse and rehabilitation has corrupted her judgement in favor of the predator.
Sometimes Lady Justice must remove her blindfold to avoid falling into an abyss ... or becoming prey.
The problem is that you cannot rehabilitate a Narcissistic sociopath.