Yes - but with respect this is much more explicit.
“In the present case, the aim was to shoot the intruder,” Masipa said.
So how do you believe this can be reconciled with the verdict?
I'm just going to say it one last time and then leave it:
-The judgment was clear that he intended to shoot the person.
-If someone intends to shoot a person, and does so and kills them, it does not necessarily constitute murder.
That's all I was saying.