Trial - Ross Harris #9

DNA Solves
DNA Solves
DNA Solves
Status
Not open for further replies.
Boring:

Regarding the mistaken measurements initially used by the 3-D scan of the vehicle, those mistakes were corrected before the jury saw the scan.

“What you were presented by the state was absolutely accurate,” Boring said.
 
Yet, the defense then made the exact same argument about Travis as the State is making here about Ross- that a sex-filled double life and terrible secrets drove him to violence. Absurd in that case, absurd in this case.

The difference being, Travis was the victim and not the one on trial. Martinez was his voice to refute those (pedophile) claims. It's not in dispute what Harris done sexting-wise. No comparison.
 
Boring continued:

What did we learn from the witnesses in the case?

The car seat was inches from the defendant. It would have been impossible to not see that child,” Boring said.

Harris would have been (in) a position to see Cooper’s head three times, he said.

The Home Depot web developer walked away from his son at the scene – leaving strangers to try to revive Cooper. “What would any reasonable person have done? They would have called 911,” Boring said.

He sat in the back of the patrol car at the scene complaining that it was too hot inside.
 
Boring:

We learned from Home Depot employees that Harris brought Cooper to daycare about 80 percent of the time.

When Harris would bring Cooper in after having Chick-fil-A, Cooper was always awake, Boring said.
 
Well he was shut inside a hot car so I would think the smell would be trapped inside and once outside there would be fresh air for the scent to disperse and therefor not be as strong as it would in the car where it had no escape

"Not as strong" is not the same as no smell at all. JMO
 
We're back to arguing about the smell? The smell is enough to prove premeditated murder to some people. I thought he must have smelt something too, until I read about all the other cases where a parent forgot their kid was in the car, left them in the sun for hours and then drove around with the dead body. Some of them drove more than once with the body in the back, and never smelt anything. I haven't heard of any parents who said they were alerted to the presence of their child in the car when they smelt something. Yet there was never any suspicion that they murdered their child on purpose.

This might just swing it for the jury, though... They haven't heard testimony about all those other parents who have done the exact same thing.
 
Why would Ross not stick his head inside the car at lunch? Why not? that's what I call asking the jury to reach way out there
 
Can someone direct me to where I can read about what happened at the scene? I haven't followed this case before trial. I'm talking about ross did when he got out of the car. Didn't he run into a store? Where was coop? Was anyone with him? WHo called 911? (Sorry I somehow missed all of This)
 
Here we go again - Boring saying Ross threw light bulbs in his car because he didn't want to see what he knew was in there.

Common sense? Common sense would be him not going to his car at lunch if he knew Cooper was dead in his car.

Complete failure of logic!
 
Dang it. I'm so far behind because I had to take my kid to school and go to my Barre3 class. I should have skipped it!
 
Going back and watching

Friend sent link to RH in chat, he responded "grossness." AFTER that interaction, the child free link was typed directly into the search bar. (This is also what Boring said.)

This is not a lie, people. It's all right there in testimony.
 
Or common sense tells you that he went to discover him and his friends drove away too quickly. IMO

Just a theory- but I was responding to the post that common sense tells you he wouldn't have went at all to the car at lunch. Logic doesn't fit when you are talking about murder IMO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Here we go again - Boring saying Ross threw light bulbs in his car because he didn't want to see what he knew was in there.

Common sense? Common sense would be him not going to his car at lunch if he knew Cooper was dead in his car.

Complete failure of logic!

I actually completely disagree with that. I think he wanted to see if anyone did discovered cooper yet and maybe if there were enough people around he would have "discovered" him then but I think he changed his mind.(maybe because copper was still alive :( )
 
2:39 p.m. Defense walks jurors through search history on Ross Harris' computer. Search history shows Harris never searched child free. Yeager says he didn't search it. He typed in the URL directly.

-----
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/ross-harr...the-ross-harris-hot-car-death-trial/457089519

I am pretty sure the jury paid enough attention to Kilgore smacking this down to know they were misled, and yes lied to about virtually everything connected with that "child-free search" thing.


And yes, Boring just lied . RH clicked on a total of 4 posts on that site, not one of them having anything whatsoever to do with being child-free, or even about children at all.

The State wouldn't have had the need to mislead and obfuscate and fog up the place with melodramtic silliness if they actually had a case against Ross Harris for malice murder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
227
Guests online
297
Total visitors
524

Forum statistics

Threads
608,502
Messages
18,240,404
Members
234,389
Latest member
Roberto859
Back
Top