The police has a list of 40 people who could be a possible suspect. According to the strongest scenario of the police that's exactly the intention of the murderer. The police thinks that Sarai is killed somewhere else.
The murderer has met Sarai around the Eminonu area where she was shooting photos. After that they went to a bar and to the murderer's house. He made her an unacceptable proposal. They started arguing, then fighting. He hit her with a hard substance and she died.
Then he took her to the Cankurtaran walls thinking that it's the best place for his disguise since a lot of junkies, homeless and immigrants live there. It was his intention to overreach the police since he knew all of those people mentioned above (the junkies etc) would have their DNA's on her and while the police will be busy finding out and investigating the 40 possible suspects, he would gain time and even watch the investigations in the walls from a distance. The blanket he covered over her is probably from a homeless guy again with the same intentions
This scenario is precisely what I said early on. Then the murder weapon, the stone that was found onsite. hmmm
The police has a list of 40 people who could be a possible suspect. According to the strongest scenario of the police that's exactly the intention of the murderer. The police thinks that Sarai is killed somewhere else.
The murderer has met Sarai around the Eminonu area where she was shooting photos. After that they went to a bar and to the murderer's house. He made her an unacceptable proposal. They started arguing, then fighting. He hit her with a hard substance and she died.
Then he took her to the Cankurtaran walls thinking that it's the best place for his disguise since a lot of junkies, homeless and immigrants live there. It was his intention to overreach the police since he knew all of those people mentioned above (the junkies etc) would have their DNA's on her and while the police will be busy finding out and investigating the 40 possible suspects, he would gain time and even watch the investigations in the walls from a distance. The blanket he covered over her is probably from a homeless guy again with the same intentions
So really, the lady who said she saw the man carrying a body near the wall could be telling the truth?! After the police deny she was moved? I'm beginning to think LE is telling stories hoping one will be true.
Hey guys, I just got finished reading from where I left off which was at 3am last night. All I can say is WOW!!!! But here is an arcticle that was just posted that I think will leave a better mark for you all on SS. I must say, I definitely appreciate how the NY Times used their words!
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/08/n...ned-from-turkey-but-mystery-remains.html?_r=0
This scenario is precisely what I said early on. Then the murder weapon, the stone that was found onsite. hmmm
The killer may have killed her by hitting her in the head with something in his apartment, then transported her body to the walls and laid her down, hitting her hard in the face/head with a stone to make it look like the murder was actually committed there...
I'd add to that list the question of what/who informed her of those walls to begin with. Not one person familiar with that area has said they believe she could have happened on them on her own. Someone told her to go there. Why? Who?
A month before her trip, Ms. Sierra formed a bond with three amateur photographers in New York, meeting several weekends in unfamiliar areas of the city to shoot digital images on her Samsung phone. She had, honestly, no fear wherever she went, said Jay Pereira, 29, one member of the group. Her mind was so adventurous. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/08/n...ey-but-mystery-remains.html?pagewanted=1&_r=1
Hey guys, I just got finished reading from where I left off which was at 3am last night. All I can say is WOW!!!! But here is an arcticle that was just posted that I think will leave a better mark for you all on SS. I must say, I definitely appreciate how the NY Times used their words!
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/08/n...ned-from-turkey-but-mystery-remains.html?_r=0
Hey guys, I just got finished reading from where I left off which was at 3am last night. All I can say is WOW!!!! But here is an arcticle that was just posted that I think will leave a better mark for you all on SS. I must say, I definitely appreciate how the NY Times used their words!
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/08/n...ned-from-turkey-but-mystery-remains.html?_r=0
Mr. Pereira said he took her to Flushing, Queens, four days before her trip. She had never been there before, he said, but quickly took to photographing train tracks at a Long Island Rail Road stop. She went down into the tracks, putting her phone literally on the rail, he said. Good thing no train came while she was down there.
Ms. Pereira said they briefly discussed her impending trip. She said, I really do need a vacation, he remembered.
Court records show Ms. Sierra filed for bankruptcy in 2005 under the weight of thousands of dollars in credit card debts. The records list her as unemployed and her marital status as separated. But her father, Dennis Jimenez, knew of no recent marital or financial troubles.
Thank you!
From the article:
Court records show Ms. Sierra filed for bankruptcy in 2005 under the weight of thousands of dollars in credit card debts. The records list her as unemployed and her marital status as separated. But her father, Dennis Jimenez, knew of no recent marital or financial troubles.
Does anyone know if a married person can file for bankruptcy without including their spouse just by saying they are separated? Or, have they really been separated this long, even though her father had no idea?
I have not had time to read all the thread just the last 10 pages but I have to ask. Has espionage been ruled out?:truce: