ThinkHard
Former Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Messages
- 3,272
- Reaction score
- 17
Thinking also about the reported time she was killed between if its true that her time of death was between 3pm and 6pm, and she was seen about a half hr walk from that spot at 130pm.....
Even if she was killed on the earlier side of that timeline that means she was still at the walls for an hr before she was attacked....that strikes me as odd. And changes the dynamic of wandering into that spot and being ambushed by an assailant.
If it was closer to later along that timeline it means she could have been alive at 420 and been the one to send that text....but clearly had been at the walls for 2 hrs at that point and via the text didn't seem to be concerned for her safety.
That varied timeline also leaves room that she went somewhere else after the walls, and some how she or at least her body made it back to the walls later, or possibley for whatever reason she was back there after dark, perhaps explaining why no one saw or heard.
I dunno this case is so weird.
I know a very well written post was written earlier about the fact the thought it was just a simply crime of a wandering tourist and the opportunity of a homeless person who lived there.
But I just don't see it, I really don't. Maybe when they catch Z that version will make more sense, but right now too much stuff doesn't fit that scenario for me.
Even if she was killed on the earlier side of that timeline that means she was still at the walls for an hr before she was attacked....that strikes me as odd. And changes the dynamic of wandering into that spot and being ambushed by an assailant.
If it was closer to later along that timeline it means she could have been alive at 420 and been the one to send that text....but clearly had been at the walls for 2 hrs at that point and via the text didn't seem to be concerned for her safety.
That varied timeline also leaves room that she went somewhere else after the walls, and some how she or at least her body made it back to the walls later, or possibley for whatever reason she was back there after dark, perhaps explaining why no one saw or heard.
I dunno this case is so weird.
I know a very well written post was written earlier about the fact the thought it was just a simply crime of a wandering tourist and the opportunity of a homeless person who lived there.
But I just don't see it, I really don't. Maybe when they catch Z that version will make more sense, but right now too much stuff doesn't fit that scenario for me.