I'm not seeing that? It says 10 hours ago. I know that picture has been posted before.
You see the HFLB and it says where are you Braqndon?
And then it shows HFLB it shows original date of 12/27
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not seeing that? It says 10 hours ago. I know that picture has been posted before.
I've been reading back through old fb posts back when B first went missing and now I'm seeing how this whole story has grown legs over time. There are those who desperately want to point fingers at landowners, LE, the 911 dispatcher, lack of searches, RW, the fact that the DPS missing person report lists him as INVOLUNTARY MISSING meaning he is not on the run etc etc. Really really poor way to try to get help to find a MP IMO.
LE almost always says NO FOUL PLAY SUSPECTED unless they have proof otherwise and they almost never name a POI or SUSPECT until they are ready to make an arrest and they almost always list MP as INVOLUNTARY MISSING or ENDANGERED MISSING. He would not be on the DPS MP list if LL or a family member did not fill out the paperwork stating he was involuntary missing and submitting it to LE. I don't even know if LE has a choice of whether or not to submit that to DPS or if it's mandatory reporting? Regardless, that DOES NOT mean that LE or the RANGER or DPS is 100% convinced that he is not missing of his own free will.
You see the HFLB and it says where are you Braqndon?
And then it shows HFLB it shows original date of 12/27
IMO- they say that land owners gave them slack about it being the first day of hunting season, wouldn't you think a hunter would have seen something in the field? I'm not sure they realize that with the harsh comments they are making people are less likely to help. If you continue to bash me, I for one would not be so willing to help you the next time. MOO
One thing I did learn is that family does not dictate to LE as to how a missing is classified. LE makes that determination. This is why so many with teens missing get upset because LE will tag as a "runaway." I also do not see forms given to family to fill out. LE gathers the info and enters into the system, a print out is generated and even that does not require family to sign. My sister is a police officer and I asked her prior to logging on. She also said family usually has to request a copy of reports. I agree that LE nor the Rangers (which I believe IS the DPS) are 100% convinced either way.
I'm not seeing it but I could be blind. This is what I see
Help Find Brandon Lawson shared Help Find Brandon Lawson's photo.
11 hours ago
I think it's an older photo that was just reposted. The comments under it are current.
I posted a link to the MP forms that have to be filled out by family members a few pages back. Not to argue but I think you may be mistaken or maybe it's different in TX. I don't believe there was a check box for RUNAWAY but I didn't look that closely. There definitely wasn't a box for VOLUNTARY MISSING because as I pointed out the person would not technically be missing if that were the case. LE has to find out from someone that a person is missing. They didn't come up with this idea on their own. And RW stated on the Observer page (I believe) that LL did not complete the MP-3 paperwork until the next week, so again maybe things are different in TX.
I compared the one you posted from DPS to the one that was posted for BL and they were the same form from what you could see of the BL photo.
At the time, I did not know who in DPS did that release. I now know it came from the lead investigator in this case.
I haven't contacted San Angelo Live, but they had done a previous article on this case. Sometimes LE will send a release to the outlet that has requested one. This is my best guess on why they got one.
My best guess on why I didn't get one from this investigator? He probably thought I'd give him a call or send him an email if I had a question.
Oh they posted a photo of the form? How on earth did they get that if only LE fills it out and submits it? :facepalm:
I posted a link to the MP forms that have to be filled out by family members a few pages back. Not to argue but I think you may be mistaken or maybe it's different in TX. I don't believe there was a check box for RUNAWAY but I didn't look that closely. There definitely wasn't a box for VOLUNTARY MISSING because as I pointed out the person would not technically be missing if that were the case. LE has to find out from someone that a person is missing. They didn't come up with this idea on their own. And RW stated on the Observer page (I believe) that LL did not complete the MP-3 paperwork until the next week, so again maybe things are different in TX.
I will have to agree ! I'm starting to think Texas has a whole different set up from the rest of the country! Of course I can only go by what my sister explained as to how her force does things, but she did say that is how it is done here in NH and CT, where she worked a few years too!
Ok there seems to be some question about GPS and a PING- they are 2 different things. GPS is on the newer phones like when your location services are on, for example you post something on FB and it says "near Boulder, CO" it can not give exact location, close but no where close to what they are claiming was. Next a ping is the tower the phone connected to, to make the call. And alot of cell companies share towers. Also not all texts can be tracked via a phone bill or detailed records. Example iphone to iphone are same operating systems are are sent via Imessage which all goes thru apple and does NOT show up on the phone bill. Anroid to iphone will show cause they are not the same operating systems. And as for data- times shown on phone bill are NOT the same time data was sent, there is a delay. How do I know this? I work in that field
So if one has an iphone and messages another iphone, can't LE subpoena the record of text messages?
On the HFBL page LL said she has a copy of all of BL's text from that night. I can only assume it was acquired via subpoena through LE.
:moo:
Ok there seems to be some question about GPS and a PING- they are 2 different things. GPS is on the newer phones like when your location services are on, for example you post something on FB and it says "near Boulder, CO" it can not give exact location, close but no where close to what they are claiming was. Next a ping is the tower the phone connected to, to make the call. And alot of cell companies share towers. Also not all texts can be tracked via a phone bill or detailed records. Example iphone to iphone are same operating systems are are sent via Imessage which all goes thru apple and does NOT show up on the phone bill. Anroid to iphone will show cause they are not the same operating systems. And as for data- times shown on phone bill are NOT the same time data was sent, there is a delay. How do I know this? I work in that field
She might be able to see them online?
I'm sorry, I should have said "see the context of the text."
I wonder if once LE obtained a copy of the text/phone calls, everything made more sense? If they had the actual context of the text, which I would think they would be interested in what the context was, it would explain the events of that night in a nutshell.