I've debated even posting this but after some thought I want to share a perspective on the questions surrounding why no one is coming to EA's defense on here or any other public medium. As a qualifier, I have no dog in this fight either...just want Christina found so her family can get closure. And I'm not directing this at anyone on this forum nor am I trying to start an argument etc., so please everyone, keep your knickers out of a twist
![Stick Out Tongue :p :p]()
eace: This is my opinion only and is not specific to this case.
I think it is human nature for our allegiance to fall on the side of the victim...I find it hard not to frankly. Something bad has happened and the person(s) responsible must pay. When you have a suspected person identified that the majority feels is the person responsible (and yes, that individual may very well have made themselves the target based on their actions), this makes it very easy for people (again, not all and NOT directed at anyone here…just in general) to be very candid about their feelings either in public (TV, Radio), or in social media. It is even more simple and prevalent when it can be done anonymously. When most people are on the same side you are on, there are really no repercussions for saying whatever you want, calling the suspected person whatever name feels appropriate, judging them, their friends, their family, etc., even if you don’t know them from Adam. This is NOT a criticism rather an observation. I think having a face and a name gives folks a direction in which to aim their feelings. Again, human nature.
Now, if you are associated in any way with the target of everyone’s suspicion the opposite becomes true. There can be very real repercussions to coming out and stating your opinion in public. Even if someone comes out on SM or TV, etc. and says nothing but wonderful things about the suspected individual, everything that is said will be dissected and potentially used in ways contrary to what the person meant. It also opens the person providing the opinion up to scrutiny themselves. Many people don’t want that. Further, if you know this person intimately (family, friends of family, close friends) you know that anything you say can be used against the person in the crosshairs. Therefore, IMO, if I were in that situation I wouldn’t say squat in public (good or bad) for fear of saying something that could end up hurting this person’s right to due process. So I guess what I’m saying is it doesn’t seem fair to me to equate silence with guilt or trying to hide something.
Regardless of what most people think of EA, if we are fair human beings, we have to remember that he also has a mom and dad, and a brother and extended family, and friends that love him and care about him. The last thing I suspect any of them would want to do is hurt him. Again, this JMO but felt the need to provide a perspective that can easily get lost in translation.