So, we can't talk about possible scenarios, EA, or anything that happened the night CM disappeared besides her walking with EA and being in his trunk?
What do you suggest we discuss, Steve? Anything of interest to you? At this point, I assume we are done until trial?
Should we be looking for a suspect anymore? To me that makes no sense. LE has already arrested the guy that did the crime, per the evidence they have, and is going to put him on trial. I think if you asked them (and they know more than anyone), the case is solved other than finding CM.
(We have to keep in mind that the verdict in the trial won't determine if the case is solved. Solving the case is determining who did it, and I believe LE is fully certain EA did it. The trial has a jury seeing if there's enough evidence to punish for the crime. If you ask me, I think there will be plenty.)
As you note, I tend to emphasize the evidence, because that's all that's allowed in a trial. And
the evidence involves her walking into the garage with EA, leaving in his car (perhaps IN HIS TRUNK already) less than 5 minutes later, being put in his trunk then or thereafter, and never being seen from again. It strongly indicates an abduction, probably a murder, done by EA.
As for what to talk about between now and the trial on a solved case? It's not up to me. I just bring my own perspective and opinions. Between now and the trial, I think we're like spectators sitting in a courtroom waiting for a trial to start. We just don't know enough to matter, so we'll talk, bat around some what-if's, and wonder about "mysteries" and "curiosities," but the case is already set and it's all about EA and only EA.
Of course there is still one thing that is NOT solved - the location of CM. That's something we could help with, perhaps. Maybe, hopefully, some day, someone here will come up with an idea that solves that one.