iamnotagolem
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2011
- Messages
- 5,746
- Reaction score
- 17,195
And not trained. Too few people want to foster now. Adding months of additional training to it would make that fact even worse.
Orphanages can work if rigorously maintained and scrutinized, but it's hard. You'd get a lot of the types who currently work group homes and mental hospitals and they can be great but also lazy and/or criminal, even though they have to be trained.
It would require a lot of employees but I think it would cost about the same per child as foster care, or even less. Many of those employees would be cooks, cleaners, gardeners. The rest would have to have training and would have more than foster parents do.
We have a children's home here called Orangewood. Many of the kids love to be there compared to foster care because the food is incredible, it's a consistent place, they have parties and outings all the time, gardens, movies, a library, on-staff counselors and a constant stream of politicians and volunteers who ensure things are run correctly and who give the kids a ton of attention. There is a waiting list for volunteers.
If we had more of those, it might be a great thing.
I'm a sucker for helping out underprivileged kids, I'd totally volunteer at a place like that.