Interesting.I wonder if LE has checked him out.His name is Brad and he lives in Alabama
Interesting.I wonder if LE has checked him out.His name is Brad and he lives in Alabama
I could see opening the door and doing a quick check around, but to me "compromising the scene" sounds more invasive than that. But maybe even touching the doorknob = compromising.
Did the police get a SW for her townhouse or her house with the ex yet? I know there needs to be probable cause but when someone is missing a SW for their home(s) should be SOP. Frankly, the ex should let them search his house. Did they search the boyfriend's house? He said they wouldn't even need a warrant.
They searched her ex's home/their shared home.
That's where they found some real estate paperwork and her broken laptop with the factory reset
I don't know if they used a SW or if the ex let them search.
Correct me if I am wrong please. The BF is saying the reason the dresses look different in the video is because of interference? The time stamp on the video stating it was the 19th was a glitch, right? Also, it was stated she was staying with the BF for 2 nights, correct? Just making sure I am understanding this clearly! Thank you!
I do not have time to go back through all of these posts, but I have my own theory. Shoot holes in it, maybe I am missing something.
The video surveillance provided by Paul H. has the incorrect date/time stamp. This could be legit, but maybe it's not? I believe it said 8/19 or something?
My question is, how do we know Crystal was indeed staying at Paul's house and leaving from there that morning? Maybe the time stamp is accurate and something happened in their relationship that week prior.
That leads me to the Motel 6. Maybe she was not staying with Paul, but instead staying at Motel 6. Does that mean she could have gone missing sooner than we thought? Text messages are just that and they do not prove that Crystal sent them. There's no fingerprint attached to a text message. Anyone with her device(s) could have sent them.
Your thoughts? Like I said, shoot holes in this.... just was something I have been pondering.
I do not have time to go back through all of these posts, but I have my own theory. Shoot holes in it, maybe I am missing something.
The video surveillance provided by Paul H. has the incorrect date/time stamp. This could be legit, but maybe it's not? I believe it said 8/19 or something?
My question is, how do we know Crystal was indeed staying at Paul's house and leaving from there that morning? Maybe the time stamp is accurate and something happened in their relationship that week prior.
That leads me to the Motel 6. Maybe she was not staying with Paul, but instead staying at Motel 6. Does that mean she could have gone missing sooner than we thought? Text messages are just that and they do not prove that Crystal sent them. There's no fingerprint attached to a text message. Anyone with her device(s) could have sent them.
Your thoughts? Like I said, shoot holes in this.... just was something I have been pondering.
I can't see a motive for the boyfriend to hurt her.
Why would she stay at a Motel 6 when she has the means to stay at a nice hotel?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Could Crystal have changed her dress? Like he saw her lay out her dress before he got in the shower, and she initially put it on, but then changed it?