SuperTmo
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2012
- Messages
- 4,810
- Reaction score
- 20,970
Actually it says "The kids ages 5 and 7 were in the home at the time but may not have seen anything"
Still catching up, so sorry if this has been said. The article has been changed to say they were home. What AM75 said is correct. Why they didn't just say they were home but didn't see anything IDK. They still want to make it sound like the kids MAY have saw something, as if it isn't awful enough as it stands.