I'll state up front I am pro-LE.
However, because of another unsolved case where video is available, I've wondered if, sometimes, having video creates a "blind eye" effect to other elements and evidence in a case. Does the video tend to drive what evidence takes precedence? Does other evidence get discounted because it does not, at that particular time, at least, fit with the video?
Does anyone know if this is a problem for investigators? And if so, how do they guard against having "video bias?" Or is that even necessary?
I guess I'm thinking out loud here. Because I don't know if having video impacts in a negative way.
The Missy Bevers case is the unsolved case I mentioned above, which has a lot of video footage of the suspect.
TX - Terri 'Missy' Bevers, 45, killed in church/suspect in SWAT gear, 18 Apr 2016 #44