We have the best judicial system in the world but it is far from prefect. .
Respectfully snipped for content.
I don't want to drag this discussion really far afield, and I agree that the US justice system is about the best there is, BUT, I still think it's the craziest most ineffective way to arrive at a decision you could possibly dream up.
Imagine that you're trying to decide whether to buy a Honda Civic. You would never put two opposing people in front of you, each with their own agenda and desire to win you over. One of the opponents is likely to be much less skilled than the other, it's random. There are strict rules of what they can say and what they can't, and you can't ask any questions or ask your friends for their opinions or research it on your own time. Yet, that's what we're asking jurors to do. It's an insane way to try to arrive at the truth of the matter.
Better, IMHO, to do it the way every normal person makes decisions. That is, have sources available that are trustworthy and can give good information, research the matter yourself, ask questions, have available ALL the information and have nothing stricken from the record.