So what's the theory now?
The article says that BD left for work 10 minutes after SA left work that morning.
The article seems to based on their cell phone pings.
So wouldn't BD's time be accounted for? Was she late for work? Did she go to work? I'm sure all of that has been checked out.
I'm blown away, but the article still doesn't have me convinced that BD is guilty. Yeah, maybe a bad parent, but I'm still not seeing why she would have wanted to kill her daughter.
All of the documents in the room about horror films, for all we know, could have belonged to SA. We already know that he was into that stuff.
And from the article itself, it seems to lean more towards SA being more deceptive. It never suggests that they think BD knows where HD is at.
Maybe I still have the blinders on, I don't know. But that article still didn't convince me that BD is involved.
Granted, it does pretty much show that SA was involved, but I'm not seeing all of this evidence towards BD.
I know this probably isn't a popular opinion at this point, but I'm sorry. Maybe I just want to believe that no mother could knowingly kill her 13 year old daughter.
With that said - if all of this information is accurate, then why have they been posting up billboards in other states? Why have they been questioning everyone about her running away? That part I don't understand.