Eexactly!But, do you feel the need to tell everyone?
Yes, and the reporter also says she dropped her “fiancee’s son” off at school. From all other accounts he is her son too. These days I’m afraid we have to take what reporters say w/a grain of salt.
The woman asking the questions is on the phone. The KVUE cameraman is directing him. His dad is in the room too.Around 4:45 mark, after standing up because he states he feels "funny," someone off-screen (cameraman?) asks him to quit swaying.
Wow. So much to unpack.
Dude smiles a lot. A LOT. He smiles in interesting moments. Like when he describes the time he left the house when he last saw her. He got a bit silly for a second there. Also when he said he last spoke to his son in the morning. (Before...?) (I wish someone would compile a list of what he was saying when he smiled).
But he smiles at various innocuous times too like when he is expressing discomfort with being in the situation, expressing emotion, etc.
He even smiled right after choking up about his dad’s cancer. And I believe he was real when choking up.
Some people do this when nervous or ashamed about emotion. However, I don’t think I’ve seen people in his situation smile and laugh except when they’re culpable.
His tears are real. He has actual tears rolling down his face and I don’t think they’re fake. They correspond with reddening of the eyes and face, which we did NOT see with Watts or Scott Peterson, etc.
I fee he uses distancing or objectifying language when asked what he would say to whoever could have her. “Just set her to the side.” I don’t think that’s how most people speak about a live human with legs that can walk.
Finally, I did not hear that he tried to call her at 1:40 pm. I heard him say that her phone was turned off when he got home at 1:40 pm. And that’s a bit more nebulous.
He specifically stated: “It’s been turned off, whenever I pulled up around 1:40. It’s its been off since then.”
Does that mean that he tried calling her then and tried calling multiple times after that? Or does he mean something else?
And why the hell don’t the reporters ask that? They ask the same questions and never delve. “Was she acting different that morning?” Okay. Good start. Now go further. “Did she shows sign of any depression? Has she acted oddly since the baby? Sad? Secretive? Said anything to indicate she was experiencing strange emotions?”
And what about, “Did you check her social media? Know if she was planning to meet anyone to buy something or pick something up?”
And, “Have the police questioned you? Have they obtained search warrants? What are they looking for?”
It’s very interesting that the station chose to publish the raw footage.
I felt he was sincere when he said he just wanted to get the word out. I also think if he’s honest about wanting to find them, he needs to get a PR person.
I won’t say what else I think he needs. Because it might prevent the case from being solved. But boy oh boy does he need it.
I agree, the content of a message doesn’t mean much one way or another. To me, it will be more interesting to learn if the call is consistent w/habitual patterns. For instance, if someone typically calls during their lunch hour it means less IMO than if a lunchtime call is unusual.Jaded? No, just being realistic given the "Here we go again," syndrome we see all too often. JMO
I spent a good deal of my career as a software developer. I'm not going to argue with you over semantics because, in the big scheme of things, it doesn't matter. OR means one of the conditions needs to be met. So, one doesn't necessarily need a description of the vehicle .No. And here’s the language regarding abductor description and/or vehicle, straight from your link:
- Has a preliminary investigation verified the abduction and eliminated alternative explanations for the child's disappearance?
- Is sufficient information available to disseminate to the public to help locate the child, a suspect, or the vehicle used in the abduction?
I agree, the content of a message doesn’t mean much one way or another. To me, it will be more interesting to learn if the call is consistent w/habitual patterns. For instance, if someone typically calls during their lunch hour it means less IMO than if a lunchtime call is unusual.
I thought the cameraman was a bit harsh actually. How is he to know whether the dad was sincere or not, hiding something or not, during a traumatic and difficult event. What did it matter that dad's phone was showing in the picture a bit, or whether he was sitting, standing or swaying?The
The woman asking the questions is on the phone. The KVUE cameraman is directing him. His dad is in the room too.
A lot of times there are just washer/dryer hookups in apartments so if tenant doesn’t own a washer and dryer they still have to use communal laundry facilities.
If you take DV out of the equation I like the laundry hypothesis, because it would explain leaving the apt w/just the baby and cell phone...
Bump for anyone just getting in and catching up (raw interview).
Heidi Broussard and her 2-week-old daughter Margot Carey were last seen Thursday a 7:30 a.m. when Broussard dropped off another child at Cowan Elementary School. Police believe they returned to their home near West William Cannon Drive and South First Street afterward, but they haven’t been seen since.
Broussard is 33 years old, 5-foot-3, 150 pounds with long, dark hair with highlights.
Mom and 2-week-old baby missing, last seen in South Austin
Fair point but, as a lawyer, you also know that isn't proof that nobody does.
Praise God that I've been NOT been in such a situation but I did have a laughing attack while on the witness stand. I'm so embarrassed to even admit it! I was 18, it was car accident case, I was a nervous wreck with a stone faced jury staring at me. Totally humiliating AND my friend lost her case. I realize that's not comparable, though, and don't mean to minimize your observations. I noticed it, too, and I'm not sure what to think. Gut reaction was very suspicious while my nature is always to give the benefit of the doubt (which hasn't always worked in my favor, I might add).
bbmWow. So much to unpack.
Dude smiles a lot. A LOT. He smiles in interesting moments. Like when he describes the time he left the house when he last saw her. He got a bit silly for a second there. Also when he said he last spoke to his son in the morning. (Before...?) (I wish someone would compile a list of what he was saying when he smiled).
But he smiles at various innocuous times too like when he is expressing discomfort with being in the situation, expressing emotion, etc.
He even smiled right after choking up about his dad’s cancer. And I believe he was real when choking up.
Some people do this when nervous or ashamed about emotion. However, I don’t think I’ve seen people in his situation smile and laugh except when they’re culpable.
His tears are real. He has actual tears rolling down his face and I don’t think they’re fake. They correspond with reddening of the eyes and face, which we did NOT see with Watts or Scott Peterson, etc.
I fee he uses distancing or objectifying language when asked what he would say to whoever could have her. “Just set her to the side.” I don’t think that’s how most people speak about a live human with legs that can walk.
Finally, I did not hear that he tried to call her at 1:40 pm. I heard him say that her phone was turned off when he got home at 1:40 pm. And that’s a bit more nebulous.
He specifically stated: “It’s been turned off, whenever I pulled up around 1:40. It’s its been off since then.”
Does that mean that he tried calling her then and tried calling multiple times after that? Or does he mean something else?
And why the hell don’t the reporters ask that? They ask the same questions and never delve. “Was she acting different that morning?” Okay. Good start. Now go further. “Did she shows sign of any depression? Has she acted oddly since the baby? Sad? Secretive? Said anything to indicate she was experiencing strange emotions?”
And what about, “Did you check her social media? Know if she was planning to meet anyone to buy something or pick something up?”
And, “Have the police questioned you? Have they obtained search warrants? What are they looking for?”
It’s very interesting that the station chose to publish the raw footage.
I felt he was sincere when he said he just wanted to get the word out. I also think if he’s honest about wanting to find them, he needs to get a PR person.
I won’t say what else I think he needs. Because it might prevent the case from being solved. But boy oh boy does he need it.
So it will be interesting to see where TES searches. If they search close by, then this may be a standard type perimeter search. However, if they conduct their search in some random place further out, then we know they’re likely working off a ping or something which gives them reason to search there, as we know that TES works with leads from LE as to where they conduct their searches.
ETA:
The search location will likely not be divulged, if Tim has his way anyway.