I honestly figure after talking to him, that the ones that havent been ruled out, he probably just has not had time to look at yet.. I had not even looked at them when I typed the list here.. I just typed it exactly as he had hand wrote it for me. I spoke with him for probably 30 minutes or maybe a little longer. He did not give me a reason for all of the ones they have ruled out.. but he did tell me some on the rule out list were due to tatoos or heigth or age.. ( which is what leads me to think he hasnt had time to look at the ones not ruled out..) Honestly I was so tired last night when I put in the list adn even while posting the pics of the possible (not rulled out) I did not even really look at the individual cases.. I just wanted to get their pics up. As he said the reason the possibles are in the file is someone related to them has called him..
I also think honestly if we came up with a list of other missing that are not already in the excluded, he would put them in the file, and present those possibilites to the cold case team. This is the reason I wanted the list from HIM of the excluded.. It seems many of us have differing views on possible matches..so all we can exclude, clears the way for the oens to look at!! Though the excluded list is short, it does narrow the search a little with each name we can cross off..(or atleast IMHO)
Something else he said that was (basically ) his own theory was he kinda felt WCJD might have been Mexican or Asian desent..but did also say with all the swelling and bruising that is hard to determine, he said it was someting about her eyes that lead him to think this.
I really wish I had been better prepared when I met with him.. When he first welcomed me to his office, I at first drew a complete blank..and couldnt even remember the main question I had..(which was the excluded list) He talk to some and told me about the task force and how he got involved in the case..and then I remembered.. I did not even have my WCJD notebook with me..Yes I am still kicking myself.. There is still a detective that I have known all my life that wrked in Walker county at the time, that I need to get ahold of.. time just has not been my friend lately.. I think this "old" det. could speak more freely since he no longer is a det..(retired)
This trip was not even planned I wasnt even thinking, I had gone to get my son from visiting my aunt there, and my daughter decided to ride also.. While I wasshowing her and her friend the sites of Huntsville, I went to what is now a cemetary where the Sam Houston house use to be..that is how I remembered..because that is the cemetary WCJD is buried in..so I showed my girl the burial site, and it occured to me I was finally in Huntsville adn it was a week day..and not a holiday, so we stopped by..then I could not for the life of me remember the Lt name..so I was chicening out, and my daughter was determined to see him, so she went in and asked around until she located him..lol
One intresting note..at the site where she was found, there is a culvert under the access road.. I figure that was where the murderer was aiming her to go... my aunt also brought up a valid point..it would be very hard for one person to drop a body off on a major interstate.. IH 45 connects Houston to Dallas so it is a pretty busy interstate.. another side note the site where the body was found was aproxiamately 4 to 5 miles from where if interstate travelers needed to fuel up or have a restroom break, would stop in Huntsville. I will get the pics up as soon as daughters friends come back over..
Thanks, Mia. I agree that Melinda Creech is the best possible of those mentioned.
Carol Donn would seem to be a rule-out based on her tattoo (if the Destinguishing Characteristics info is correct).
Porchlight member
faithhopelove received the same list from Lt. Perkins last month. However, in that list, the following MP's who have not been ruled out, are characterized as unlikely.
Lori Jean Lloyd
Carol Elaine Donn
Michelle Meredith Mulcahy,
http://z10.invisionfree.com/usedtobedoe/index.php?showtopic=58566&view=getnewpost