salvarenga
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Messages
- 2,201
- Reaction score
- -174
We have a phone call to Mom's work THAT MORNING (Jonathan asking for SE's #), then ANOTHER CALL to work saying it's an emergency. Then Mom heads home, apparently at around 2 which was when she was originally supposed to get home. (1 or 2). Step Dad checks on him at 1:45 (did mom call SD and tell him to check on him?), says he's fine, but in the meantime, Mom is calling over and over on her way home and finally a raspy voiced woman answers, a few MOMENTS later mom pulls up and he is not there. Then at some point, she gets "a call threatening her son".
Now, add to that that Mona says she was there in the morning to get SE's #, well that appears to be true considering JF called to get #.
That is INCREDIBLY tight timing. Not saying it could not have happened, but it just don't feel right, it feels OFF.
I saw an interview somewhere on this thread today while catching up where the stepmom was blaming LE saying that they didn't react quickly enough. That they were treating the situation like he was a runaway.
Now my question is, if she told LE that she received "a call threatening her son" and her son is now missing how could they have treated him as a runaway?
Something is not adding up here. IMO, is this "mom" and "stepdad" have lied about anything that delayed justice for this innocent child then they should be sitting in jail too. I don't care if they lied about so much as how many times they used the toilet that day. Your child is missing! YOU DO NOT LIE, COVER UP, MISLEAD LE ABOUT ANYTHING!!!! (Sorry, rant over.)