I believe it was stated there was no soot in his lungs.. but that's not a direct quote and i saw it posted on here
And in response to
she gagged him then a lot of the welding smoke wouldn't have gotten into his lungs.
by Oceanblueeyes:
If he was gagged, you'd not find soot in his mouth, but he very well could've inhaled it via his nose...and would have made it to the back of the sinuses and/or throat, and perhaps into the lungs itself.
But I'm hesitant to think that the acetylene torch leaves much soot flying around to be inhaled, irrespective of him being gagged.
Soot, char, and other constituents of smoke is from other things burning - in a regular fire, sofas, curtains, walls, wood burn. When an autopsy says "no soot in the lungs", it means that it was either a very clean burning fire (e.g. like a torch) or it was not a typical fire, and did not burn as we see in our fireplaces and with most fires.
I can't rule out being torched to death based solely on no soot present. I wish I could.
And one small note of reassurance - once a burn is big enough and deep enough, the nerve bundles have been destroyed, and the pain would not be felt (there have been cases of people burned so badly they are unaware of their injuries). I know that does not help much, but I hold out hope that he had been unconscious before being burned...and, that once burned, it was so extensive that nerves and conduction impulses were disrupted and his pain was less.
I have nothing to say about MN. I usually do have something to say. But I just can't find the words for how I feel about this person.
God Bless you, Jonathan, and I know you are now safe in God's Arms. He's got all the newest video games, and all the time in eternity to play them.
Best-
Herding Cats