My understanding is that he was on an active contract working at the Chocolate Bayou facility.
I suppose it's possible that the company he was actually contracted with may not have been made aware of his absence.
Or that the information was sent to Deer Park, but may have been stovepiped by someone inclined to just make a notation and chalk it off as an employee who simply walked off.
If he was on an active contract, I dont think it is likely that the contracting company would have failed to realize his appereance, or non appereance as they would have been billed for his presence. Thus, if he was on the contract, he would have been noted as being part of the requested number. Likewise, if he did not appear, the contracting company would have said: "
Dont bill us for Jubal yesterday, he did not show up" followed by maybe "
We need a substitute".
Or that the information was sent to Deer Park, but may have been stovepiped by someone inclined to just make a notation and chalk it off as an employee who simply walked off.
Is Deer Park where the employment agency is? If so, I think that is possible, but not likely.
The employment agency receives regular feed back from the contractor on the performance (or lack thereof) of the temporary workers. In addition, they have other checks as the employment agency does not want to pay workers who were actually no-shows. Though it is possible that due to a mix up, they would think Jubal was one of say, six pipefitters on the job, when he was in fact a no show and a substitute had been sent, this would normally be cleared up very fast.
I'm also seeing that INEOS Chocolate Bayou (or a specific functional division there) is currently undergoing a "shut-down" for maintenance. Do you know if that might typically be a situation where contracted labor (like pipefitters) is brought in to conduct the periodic/one-time work?
I'm assuming the 7-day work week is driven by economics: the sooner the work is completed, the end of the costs incurred from contracted labor. And in the circumstances of a shut-down, the sooner production is back online.
Though I dont have experience in chemical plants either, I think that is entirely possible. I have worked at other industrial plants where they only had say, two certified welder / pipe fitters on staff. They would be able to handle day to day repairs, but not maintenance shut downs. As the company I worked for was large, they just flew in people from another location rather than use temporaries. A smaller company could well use temporaries for these.
My bet is that the maintenance shut down is accompanied by an inspection by the government. I was used as a temporary general carpenter alot for hospitals / rehab centers that were being inspected by the State soon and had alot of little fixes that needed to be done quickly. I imagine it is the same for chemical plants, just more technical.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I gather that the nature of the work is often/usually on a temporary basis, thus the need for contracted labor and the necessity for the skilled workforce to work in regularly changing geographic locations.
Yes, that is how it works. Employing such a work force is usually due to an unexpected or expected surge in the need for employees. Once the surge is ended, the contract is terminated. The better perfoming temporaries, however, can be offered permanent jobs though.