DAnthrplgst
Active Member
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2014
- Messages
- 899
- Reaction score
- 158
Did LE ever say if the sighting near New Mexico/CO was confirmed?
[FONT="]He's been arrested for theft, burglary, [/FONT]child[FONT="] *advertiser censored* and for multiple cases of domestic abuse.
[/FONT][FONT="]"She was hung by her wrists, on the pipes inside the apartment, and he had beat her with a baseball bat, [/FONT][FONT="]
[/FONT]
Did LE ever say if the sighting near New Mexico/CO was confirmed?
Not that I am aware of. They have been quiet. Which has me hopeful they are alive.
Could they be in dance recital costumes? If you saw my daughter who was four years old in hers- she's really angry in her photo because Mom woke her up from her nap to get her ready for her recital, and she wouldn't smile for any of the photos for all the money in the world, lol. She also could have felt unwell and just not up to having her picture taken or just been tired from a long and busy day.Im not sure why they chose those photos (her account is accessible to public with plenty of normal, happy photos...I feel like Lulu doesnt even look like that photo in her others (she is wearing makeup, low-cut dress etc in that one). I wish they would have chose a more appropriate photo, one that would help to identify her and not tell a story so to speak that might not be helpful in finding her
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Could they be in dance recital costumes? If you saw my daughter who was four years old in hers- she's really angry in her photo because Mom woke her up from her nap to get her ready for her recital, and she wouldn't smile for any of the photos for all the money in the world, lol. She also could have felt unwell and just not up to having her picture taken or just been tired from a long and busy day.
I'm pretty sure they are alive as well. I hate to say this but the girls are more valuable to him alive then dead. They can be used as a bargaining chip or, as ghastly the thought, as a human shield in the event of a potential shoot-out with LE. I don't think he took them for any untoward behavior, I think they were taking strictly as insurance policy. Of course, this is presuming he actually took them and that he and the girls weren't victims of some other screw-ball.
Also meant to add that on the run with two young girls poses much more hindrance for him. Sadly. IMO
I'm pretty sure they are alive as well. I hate to say this but the girls are more valuable to him alive then dead. They can be used as a bargaining chip or, as ghastly the thought, as a human shield in the event of a potential shoot-out with LE. I don't think he took them for any untoward behavior, I think they were taking strictly as insurance policy. Of course, this is presuming he actually took them and that he and the girls weren't victims of some other screw-ball.
Not sure on his motive. My biggest fear is they witnessed their Mothers murder. Which puts the girls odds not in their favor. I try not to think about what they may be enduring. His past behavior is alarming to say the least.
They're more valuable to him alive than dead because of what he wants them for.
I won't get any more detailed but I have a feeling everyone gets what I mean.
He was charged with murder in the 2014 death of Pamela Parker in Sulphur, but a grand jury ultimately failed to indict him for the crime.
I sure would like to see some kind of plea for the safe return of his daughter.
I dunno about the angle of them witnessing their mother's murder. If they were witnesses to the murder it would make more sense to kill them at the same time as their mother. Lets assume for a moment they witnessed it, then that means he would have had to have the girls restrained in some way lest they run away and call for help, if his intent was to silence a witness then killing them at the same time, while they are restrained would make more sense than abducting them and risking their getting away while they are on the lam.
What about the child *advertiser censored* charges?Respectfully, I think you are incorrect in this assumption. There is nothing in his record to indicate he is a pedophile or hebephile. This doesn't have any hallmarks of a sexual predation.
Respectfully, I think you are incorrect in this assumption. There is nothing in his record to indicate he is a pedophile or hebephile. This doesn't have any hallmarks of a sexual predation.