HI BCA, Dr Cr@ne was mentioned in Lori's 1997 bankruptcy. We are not sure why she owed him money.
ETA: See posts 1046 and 1047 of this thread.
Some say it's because that ID was born in one state and died in another. My opinion is she was not older.. I actually think she was the same or younger. I would be interested in seeing her MD/OBGYNs records as we could then form an opinion based on their notes. There are a few thing s that would be telling of age or if she had a child previously.
So how did the woman who became LEK (or the person(s) who helped her) know BST was born in one state & died in another? The headstone has no information about where the 3 girls were born.
I had a peek at the image of the news clipping that reported their death in the other thread. It provides the information, although garbled: it states first that "Becky Sue" (correctly Anne Marie) was born in Auburn, Kay Francis in Puyallup, & Becky Sue (the real one) in Bakersfield, California. (FWIW, I hadn't noticed that mistake until this moment, despite having read it half a dozen times. Has anyone noticed it before, & I'm just the latest to stumble over that error?)
So, assuming that the most desirable identity to steal would be a child born in one jurisdiction that died in another, whoever found the identity probably did not find it through searching thru grave yards. It was either thru genealogical research -- say a distant relative or a contact of the same -- or through a newspaper article like the one in the other thread. (Or one of those Gardner 1850 posted earlier in this thread -- see posts #516 & 517.)
So how did the woman who became LEK (or the person(s) who helped her) know BST was born in one state & died in another? The headstone has no information about where the 3 girls were born.
I had a peek at the image of the news clipping that reported their death in the other thread. It provides the information, although garbled: it states first that "Becky Sue" (correctly Anne Marie) was born in Auburn, Kay Francis in Puyallup, & Becky Sue (the real one) in Bakersfield, California. (FWIW, I hadn't noticed that mistake until this moment, despite having read it half a dozen times. Has anyone noticed it before, & I'm just the latest to stumble over that error?)
So, assuming that the most desirable identity to steal would be a child born in one jurisdiction that died in another, whoever found the identity probably did not find it through searching thru grave yards. It was either thru genealogical research -- say a distant relative or a contact of the same -- or through a newspaper article like the one in the other thread. (Or one of those Gardner 1850 posted earlier in this thread -- see posts #516 & 517.)
@Linda, where are you at with this? I know you've been diligently plodding away on it for years and are probably party to some information that you can't discuss here.
Is it gonna get solved?!?!
I totally trust that Velling was very close when he sent that message. I however, got crazy and posted too much info here and burned my contact..
Do you think it's possible it HAS been solved and all of the above (plus the family) now know who she is?
Yeah, I wonder what FLEK's letter to her daughter (to be opened on her 18th birthday) reads. Hopefully the family has actually read that.
The letter was supposedly read by police and family as part of the investigation into her suicide. Someone who read it (police?) called it the ramblings of a disturbed person (my paraphrase).
Well, to investigators who were assuming she was LEKR.... would they not deem it to be ramblings until they realize that she isn't who she said she was and that her letter may reveal more truth than fiction?
Just to recap, that message from Velling was sent to the Ruff's neighbour / amateur PI, yes?
And Velling had got that info from Professor Derek Abbot (of Somerton Taman Shud fame)?
And you were in contact with neighbour PI dude (sorry I have forgotten his name) but now you're not because someone screenshotted your post here and put it on FB and he got cross, correct?
And we think the result was a 19 year old runaway from PA who was tracked via some genealogy site?
(just getting it straight in my head!)
Do you think it's possible it HAS been solved and all of the above (plus the family) now know who she is?
Yes and no.
Velling and Abbott have no connection.
I spoke to Abbott and he said there was a DNA match. ( with no further info given by him)
The PI and I spoke and discussed this( as we were both excited and perplexed)..
He then spoke to Velling, who said they were very close to solving the case. VELLINGs comments were not related to or based on Abbots.
It was coincidental timing but not necessarily related.
And I should have not posted that screenshot.. I fully acknowledge that. I have been more careful as of late. Let that be a warning to all not to divulge your sources here.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well, to investigators who were assuming she was LEKR.... would they not deem it to be ramblings until they realize that she isn't who she said she was and that her letter may reveal more truth than fiction?
Bingo.
I am not firmly in any camp about FLEK's real identity, however I am firmly in the camp where her widower either knows or doesn't want to know. Irrespective of which it is, the ends are the same: we are nearing 6 years out from her death but no closer to a public ID. There is public interest, IMO, in tracing FLEK's movements and identifying her because the process itself may be clues to help locate/solve other missing persons or fugitives. Especially the Bradford Bishop case as I think he must have used similar methods in obtaining new ID before fleeing.
I really, really think the suicide letters should be released as part of the case file. If the Seattle Times filed a Freedom of Information Act request, then the letters would have been included one would think.