Trudie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2018
- Messages
- 11,496
- Reaction score
- 66,796
It appears to me, the “reunification” of children removed from parents has a different meaning to caseworkers!
Perhaps we the public have not been on the same page as to the meaning that social workers and judges use.
By reunifying children back into the home, the caseworker
‘s work is greatly reduced as well as the expense to the state.
There is not all the time and procedures, red tape, of case worker dotting every i and crossing their t’s to investigate, fill out the mountains of paperwork, to revoke parental rights so the child is available for adoption.
Add to that the placement of child in foster care while all this is being worked out which may have many changes with additional time and work.
Foster care parents are paid money by the state and as I understand, each state has separate rules as to how long the parents giving up parental rights receive money as well as adoptive parents receive money.
Again, I question, is reunification basically due to cutting the case load and the expense to the state?
I’m trying to understand why anyone thinks abuse suddenly stops if a child is removed for a period of time or a CW visits now & then. Smh
If any of us found our sitter abused our child we would not use her again 3 months later.