Wow.
I spent last night and today reading all 30 pages to be up to speed before commenting.
I find some people in either camp extremely judgmental based on very superficial garbage.
After reading all pages I am 50/50.
The last couple of pages I see mention of her and mental illness and yet unless I missed it or forgot it in 30 pages, I saw no source for this whatsoever? People saying they are not judging on economic status, relationships, number of father say they are basing on mental issues? Where exactly does that come from?
The ones in his camp some almost seem like they are enamored. Not all, but some. The ones in hers some seem to not be able to believe a woman could do this and others seem like they base it on common scenarios of which when there is an argument admittedly the night before, it generally is the other person.
I find nothing odd about her not having recent pictures of herself with her children. Not ONE bit. People vary that way and her children also clearly were in activities and saw their fathers and possibly not on the same schedule either. The three being together may be rare with such busy lives, AND I myself have never been into selfies and it is not the interest of children that age either to have photos with family as much as with friends, etc.
When do you ever hear anyone called a suspect anymore unless they are at large or arrested? I can name recent cases where they will not even use the term POI ever. To use it says something to me.
He may be innocent but just because an ME called it a suicide is no reason whatsoever to not look further into this. I don't care if he is the god of MEs. How many suicides (alleged) through the years went down probably when they were murders? Especially in the day and age where they would not charge a circumstantial case, need a body, or need more evidence... Many have been found later when the person murdered again.
It of course is just the DM for a MSM source, but the one article several pages back said the sheriff said there has been trouble getting much video cam coverage. Really? In an area gated and will million dollar homes? Why?
To people that say if it was a man who killed his children and himself no one would question it, in those cases it is usually to punish the other spouse they take the children with. The bf here was not the parent of either child and I seriously doubt even had any affectionate ties with them.
Most ex-husbands or boyfriends would waste no time in trashing an ex and saying she was a nutcase, when she was with me she came at me with a knife, threw a vase at me, etc. No such thing is being said, just the opposite. Good mom, shows she can maintain a good relationship with an ex, etc. If they don't believe she could or would do it, that is very significant to me.
People talk about their different social "classes" and economic status. Gag. Cops have murdered, millionaires have murdered, politicians have murdered, poorer economic classed people have murdered. People have murdered in the name of God or a supposed leader of a church. Etc. Such assumptions kill me.
Did he ever have children or how successful have his relationships been? Never saw a word about it.
This may sound like I think he did it and I do not. I am undecided. But after 30 pages, I see a lot of looking into her, judging of her and who she knows but very little known about him other than PR ****.
Just saying...