The police report that was done at the time of the actual accident doesn't say that he was unlicenced OR charged, it actually says under the "Tow" section that the vehicle was driven from the scene by the owner. Not sure if that driver was Sini, but it did not indicate that any charges were being pressed for wrongdoing or being unlicensed.
If you go through all the documents, the plaintiff is saying he did not make any attempt to not hit her and she is suing for medical expenses, this lawsuit came about quite a long time after the accident, if I recall it was several plus months later, the accident report clearly shows that WM hit her on her back passenger side and his front driver side (which indicates to me an attempt to move over).
Obviously, I have no real clue what happened, but the fact that no charges were pressed for driving without a license suggests pretty strongly to me that he was licensed. Also, I read in one of the court things that the lawyer is on behalf of their insurance company, and to my knowledge, you can't be insured if you don't have a license, though that may be different for different areas/states/countries.
Basically, the only thing I have seen after reading through everything is that there was a fender bender and no charges were pressed meaning no signs of reckless driving, driving under the influence, or any other laws were being broken.
I am in Canada and we often joke that "Americans are sue happy", meaning there is a lawsuit for everything. If I had only read the accident report and then these court things I wouldn't second guess that it was anything more than an unfortunate accident...
