Well, now, Boudy, I don't know about those jagged edges on the white item as I feel they are straight lines and not jagged. If you click on the attachment of the SS I inserted, the frame of the door appears jagged when in real life, we know for a fact, that the frame of the door is a solid straight line.
Interesting idea about SP requiring glasses. Maybe wore contacts for the crime? I mean the intent was to murder and not miss so SP had to see clearly, as in 20/20, right?
Also, I totally agree the footwear is amiss. Those soles are an obvious misfit, at particular times in the CCTV, especially, when rounding the SW corner near the Dutch door. I don't mind viewing the video several times more than the 5,792,845,438,593 times I've already watched to look specifically for flat-footedness even though I see about an inch high soles as the soles appears longer than the boots they're attached to.
You've offered a feasible explanation about the action at the Dutch door being due to removing the padding of the helmet; therefore, the helmet sits lower on the head. Some have suggested SP didn't know that was a Dutch door is why the head tilts although, I definitely disagree. SP knew that Church very well. The degree of planning is obvious due to the tight timeline when the murder actually occurred, SP escaped and the CGs found Missy unresponsive.
Either SP acquired a set of blueprints or a long-time member, or ex-member, assisted or something or someone dependable was relied on for this risky mission to even enter the Creekside Church knowing it had motion detecting security cameras.
SP didn't care about being seen on the CCTV. SP cared about the safe places where the attack could take place out of the range of the cameras. Where are those safe places exactly?
