I don't like repeating a lot of known information but I feel strongly that Missy was killed by a stranger, making it a far more difficult murder to solve.
He was inside 30 minutes before Missy arrived. If that is shortly before, I don't see how it points to a planned murder (or just a burglary gone wrong either).
SP was seen inside, wandering about at 3:50 AM, not setting up to ambush Missy. Missy in parking lot 4:16, then entering at 4:20, the SP had 30 minutes to get set up, to case the place, check out the window view of the parking lot, make sure his exit was planned out. Try different hiding places to get a clear shot. But he did nothing but prowl, no evidence of adrenaline, excitement or nerves for what he was going to do. Pls don't say the killer was so experienced and professional, they didn't exhibit normal human behavior. This person is not a professional hitman, nor a professional burglar. If they knew she was there for a class, they also knew the "campers" could arrive at 4:30 or earlier. (The first one was there at 4:35) What would the (hired) killer have done if several arrived with Missy? Disappear out the back, I guess.
According to the podiatrist, Missy was startled, she turned her head, as if towards a noise. The killer was not set up and waiting, he didn't even know she had pulled into the parking lot and entered the building, he made noise! Instead of catching her off-guard, he was also startled, maybe threw his hammer, or hit her once, then got his gun out and shot her. (We don't have the autopsy, we don't have the facts to counter this or to call it overkill). Total lack of planning. If someone hired the killer, what did they say to the killer? "She might have her handgun on her and she has self-defense training so go hand-to-hand with her first and then maybe have a shoot-out?" "She might arrive with a group of campers, so you might have only a minute to kill her, get out and drive away unseen?"
The podiatrist was really affected by seeing Missy's realizing that she wasn't alone. Ugh
CBS News FBI used a forensic podiatrist to analyze the suspect gait/.
We don't know for a fact that nothing was taken, even if they say nothing is missing, I don't trust that information. We do know SP was in an office as files were mentioned. Maybe he was looking for small valuables. I'd guess he went thru any desk drawers. We haven't been told if there was a money/lock box or small safe in the office, or if some office cash was missing. We do know that he was seen carrying a small white plastic basket with tools(?) that he picked up in the church.
I don't think SP was stealing it, but I think it's the last thing a killer would carry around the church.
I'm not leaning towards that theory but I was thinking how to make it fit and the only way to make it make sense is to assume:
1. Casual behaviour before planned murder - maybe some courage gained from drugs or alcohol,
2. Anyone who had a grudge against Missy could not have a way to get in touch with proffesional hitman, so they could hire well known nut who would do that for money,
3. It's hard to develop a mortal grudge against someone not knowing much about them so the person who hired the sloppy hitman or dressed like one themselves could know that Missy never took her gun with her while entering the church,
4. Murderer had some outside help that watched the parking lot and made sure that Missy is entering the building alone, agreeing to maybe call the
hitman if others would show up before 4:30
5. Despite of the whole point of murderer's activity between breaking in and Missy's arrival was to make it look like a burglary, they actually managed to forget to steal something obvious and eye-catching so literally everyone would notice that they took it.
Some sense it makes.
Some. This could happen, but apart from point 3. partially (cause I'd think that's pretty common thing for people to leave their guns behind while visiting church and could be widely discussed thing among members so possible to learn somehow what was Missy's attitde towards it) it requires not only those highely unlikely circumstances to occure before, but many other to follow.
Like:
- sloppy first time hitman or crazy violatile murderer to have a lot of luck
- and ability to not give themselves away in any way in the following years after not leaving any noticeable tracks,
- despite of getting away with something so bold and cheeky pretty easily not one but actually TWO people would need to keep their heads low for years, or die/leave the area not causing any suspicions WHILE this huge investigation is still ongoing, and most likely being on the list of people considered as possible POI's,
and few more.
Oh, oh, and one more elephant in the room I think.
I may be wrong, but wasn't all that supposed unfaithfullness on Missy's side just those flirtatious and inappropriate message exchange on the linkedin? In some coverages of her story she grews into some serious local femme-fatale-maneater-homewrecker type that's usually met on the pages of romantic novels. Flirting is pretty petty reason to murder someone and those who are doing it, are glowing like red flags in the size of whole state - at least after but mostly also before. Stalker would be much more likely than jealous-whoever.
And to have this theory (about targetted killing) fit, the perp would need to be able to obscure that.
It doesn't really make sense logically... unless many unusual factors not only came into play but kept coming, for extended period of time. It's still theoretically possible but I see only two:
a) bizarre outfit,
b) oddly many supposed locals/Texans believing that's how classic revenge killing could be executed and obscured
- also the second one is kinda iffy, cause no telling if all those people came to their conclusion relying on all (or as many as possible) factual info that is out there. So it could be just one. That's not enough. That's more on the side of making clues fit the theory than collecting clues to came with a theory.
IMO still worth considering but more points out at the burglary gone wrong.
Also: does staying in motion decreases the risk of car plates being visible on surveillance with that weather? If so, did it worked in all cameras? Most cameras? Those at SWFA store?
Sheer luck that was or maybe some experience and knowledge behind it? - definitely not so much with burglary, but maybe with surveillance and security?