My additions to the new thread, and answering some questions from the previous thread. Thank you all for the kind welcome! I tend to be long-winded, so forgive me in advance.
Yes, I believe the subject in the video is a non-athletic male who is not elderly. My definition of old might be different than others, so I'll just leave it at non-elderly. The sway back and head-forward posture is not uncommon, but to the degree seen in footage of the Bevers family members and the subject in the footage, it is much less common.
Yes, the physical traits of members of the Bevers men I mention could extend to other family members, but Im keeping my evaluations on this forum to those persons who have been shown in the media.
Speculations about the crime in the media that I have already disregarded:
1. That the person in the surveillance footage is female.
The upper-to-lower body ratio alone tells me the subject is male. Again, I could be wrong, but this and other traits confirm it for me. The surveillance footage is distorted due to a wide angle lens, making the suspect appear at times squatty, short, heavier. On footage where the suspect is in the center of the frame (where the least distortion occurs), he appears leaner and taller.
2. That the victim suffered stab wounds from a knife.
"Puncture wounds" do not necessarily mean stabbing or knife. As has been reported already, her injuries are consistent with the weapon the suspect is holding in surveillance footage, which I believe is a rock hammer.
I also do not believe there is a wider conspiracy. When it comes to murder, the likelihood of a suburban housewife being the target of a wider conspiracy is close to nil. In addition, the plan, scenario, disguise, etc. do not fit with the theory of a wider conspiracy or professional hit. Rather, they indicate to me an attempt to divert attention away from a person or persons close to the victim.
I do not disregard persons of interest based on alibi. As I mentioned earlier, alibis are not an indication of innocence. Elaborate or non-routine alibis may actually indicate deception and planning. My thinking is if youre a suspect in a murder, where would you like to be during the commission of a crime? At home alone where no one could verify your alibi? Or as far away as possible with a trail of tickets and receipts, social media posts, etc.? The latter, of course. If you were innocent and unaware of an imminent murder, youd be home in bed. If you knew what was about to go down or were involved, youd want to create as much of an alibi as possible for the time of the crime.
I'm loving reading everyone's ideas on this.
