Cannonball3804
Former Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2016
- Messages
- 1,428
- Reaction score
- 4
I THINK AT THIS POINT THE STAINED SHIRT IS A MUTE POINT,BUT CARRY ON IF YOU PLEASE. LE STUDIED THE SHIRTS. THEY WERE ALL LISTED IN THE WARRANT TO SEARCH, BUT ONLY TOOK THE ONE THEY THOUGHT MY BE RELAVANT TO THE CASE.
IT DOES NOT TAKE LONG TO DETERMINE HUMAN BLOOD FROM ANIMAL WITH KNOWN POSSIBILITIES. IT CAN BE DONE UNDER A MICROSCOPE. IF THE INNITIAL OUTCOME WAS ANIMAL(DOG) THEN THEY MAY HAVE PROCESSED IT TO RUN DNA, BUT IF THE STORY WAS COOBORATED BY VET, OTHER WHITNESSES, AND LE WAS SATISFIED WITH IT, I DOUBT ANY FURTHUR TESTING WILL BE DONE.
I applaud the broud array of theories on this website, but some of them are so speculative, and easily run away from one persons speculation to anothers theory based on the innitial speculation, that at a point it does get cumbersom to read through the same rehashed commentary page after page. I think what some are asking is that everyone please go back and read all post in all previous threads before comenting or rehashing speculation that has been run in to the ground based on nothing but wild assumptions. I would suggest a reset, starting with what we actually know, and continuing to try to identify objects we have a visual of, along with plausable speculation based on know facts. Often readers who dip in and out, read somthing and take it for fact and I see 3 and 4 pages of back and forth just for someone who is up to speed make the correction, and even then, it often takes another page or two for the facts to sink in. some here are good at spot reading and keeping up. others not so much. rampant speculation based on nothing more that comparing persons, or motives to what is common, often lead away from the answers as apposed to towards them.
You mentioned "speculative". Respectfully, pretty much everything about this case is speculative since we have so little to go on.
Assistant Chief Johnson said his dozen or so team members meet in a room every morning for a daily briefing and hash through ideas and theories. In a social media sense, that is exactly what we are doing here.
On the bloody shirt, IIRC no one had mentioned before I did that the bloody shirt can be tested for other evidence besides just blood. Discussion of the delay in testing led me to find information that labs typically test ALL evidence related to a case at the same time.
That's pretty interesting to know - that even if the shirt provides nothing of value, getting the shirt results might coincide with getting all the other CSI results as well. Which might lead to a break in the case.
I think talking about the same thing over and over, though annoying for some, may be helpful when someone looks at it from a different angle. JMO