I am just trying to keep it the FEW FACTS we know Factual and it does matter. As stated by reporter May 4, MPD in a statement by this reporter "..
.they would not be commenting further on the affidavits especially not about the cause of Missy's death or mechanism of injury - information only the killer would know" [video=youtube;eWsSgzgJFpQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWsSgzgJFpQ[/video]
I have posted prior in this and last thread about Mechanism of Injury that MPD does not want to speak about. Cause of Death is different than Mechanism of Injury.
mechanism of injury Abbreviation: MOI
The manner in which a physical injury occurred (e.g., fall from a height, ground-level fall, high- or low-speed motor vehicle accident, ejection from a vehicle, vehicle rollover). The MOI is used to estimate the forces involved in trauma and, thus, the potential severity for wounding, fractures, and internal organ damage that a patient may suffer as a result of the injury.
http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/mechanism+of+injury
I also saw comments from yesterday about Blood Spatter. I found this interesting especially in this case:
Snip:
Blood can tell you more than whose veins it used to flow through. The pattern of a
stain can determine where a person was when the blood was shed and whether the
victim was alive or dead at the time.
A blood spatter will often be formed of a blob with a fine tail at one side. This
pattern indicates that the blood was travelling fast when it hit the object and the tail
will point in the direction it came from. Experts can work out from which direction
the blood struck the object. If the stain is circular, blood struck the object straight
on; if the stain is egg-shaped, blood came from an angle, and the greater the angle
the more stretched out the egg-shape will be. If the blood has travelled at great
speed, the blood droplet will be surrounded by numerous smaller flecks. A
smudged blood stain tells you someone rubbed against it. Trails of blood can show
how an incident developed, and how people moved from place to place. Quite
often, both the assailant and victim will lose blood at the crime scene so it’s
important to determine whose blood makes up each separate mark. A large pool of
blood shows the victim was alive in that spot for some time following the wound.
Dead bodies stop bleeding quickly because the heart stops after death. If spatter
marks are clear, you can learn about the type of weapon used. The pattern of blood
spatter can also reveal if the assailant was right or left handed. A narrow track of
blood suggest that something fine, such as a sharp knife was used where a broad
band of blood spatter could suggest a large weapon like a bat or stick. A great
amount of spatter can also suggest the emotion behind the attack. A great deal of
spatter can suggest and angry assailant which can suggest some level of intimacy
with the victim. Finally a spot with no blood can also be revealing in an area with a
great deal of spatter. It may suggest the assailant picked something up such as a
bag or box and removed it from the crime scene.
http://cisgrade9.weebly.com/uploads/1/9/5/7/19574969/blood_spatter.pdf
We had an Awesome member to transcribe the 3 or 4 (cant remb off hand) Press conferences by MPD (Midlothian Police Dept) Those and the SW are the most helpful. JMHO
