No it's not
that simple
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2015
- Messages
- 4,364
- Reaction score
- 4,917
Like I said a couple of weeks ago, the real problem isn't that people quote from the wrong places, the REAL problem is we have NO REAL NEW CLUES!! We all need to face that fact.
One can certainly get a new perspective on old clues.
One example: Folks consider the perp's wandering and breaking inside the church as staging. Staging is supposed to redirect from the truth, to cover it up. Why would the perp "stage" the inside, if he knew he was taped on video? On could argue, he did not know about the inside surveillance cams. He had to know about the outside surveillance cams (signs). Since he "did not know" the outside cams were not functioning that early Monday morning, he costumed all up to conceal his identity. That's what he want's you to believe: That he had no "insider" knowledge about being taped inside. That's why he is meandering around and breaking glass, besides introducing the tools he will later use to kill MB. All MO of course, but you see what I am saying. He is trying to officially "blame" his outfit on the outside cams.
He is lining up so much randomness, that in itself it becomes a pattern. This person is a dilettante. Whether they were under contract or not. He mad mistakes, he will continue to make mistakes and get caught in it. I strongly believe the evidence (cell phone dump, possible trace evidence (boots), DNA (sweat? touch? eyelash?) will eventually break this case. I may be in the minority here, but I have no doubt about it.
-Nin